UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025

OR

☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ____________ to ____________

Commission file number: 001-41581

RENX ENTERPRISES CORP.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(786) 808-5776

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒ 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐ 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐ No ☒ 

The aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2025, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was approximately $2,290,409 million, based upon the last reported sale price of the registrant’s common stock on that date as reported by Nasdaq Capital Market.

As of March 31, 2026, the registrant had a total of 2,507,537 shares of common stock outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

RENX ENTERPRISES CORP

FORM 10-K

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Annual Report”) contains “forward-looking statements” that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements. The statements contained in this report that are not purely historical are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the “Securities Act”, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the “Exchange Act.” Forward-looking statements are often identified by the use of words such as, but not limited to, “anticipate,” “believe,” “can,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “project,” “seek,” “should,” “strategy,” “target,” “will,” “would” and similar expressions or variations intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements are based on the beliefs and assumptions of our management based on information currently available to management. Such forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other important factors that could cause actual results and the timing of certain events to differ materially from future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those identified below and those discussed in the section titled “Risk Factors” included under Part I, Item 1A below. Furthermore, such forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this report. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements. 

Although we believe that our assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements are reasonable, any of the assumptions could prove inaccurate and, therefore, there can be no assurance that the forward-looking statements included in this report will prove to be accurate. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements included herein, the inclusion of such information should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person that the objectives and plans of ours will be achieved. Investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date on which such statements are made. Any forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf speak only as of the date they are made, and we do not undertake to update any forward-looking statement that may be made from time to time on our behalf.

As used in this Annual Report, unless the context requires otherwise, references to “RenX”, “the Company”, “we”, “us”, and “our” refer to RenX Enterprises Corp. and its subsidiaries, as the context requires. References to “Common Stock” refer to the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share. 

“RenX” and the RenX logo are our trademarks. All other trademarks and service marks appearing in this Annual Report are the property of their respective owners.

On March 26, 2026, we effected a 1-for-20 reverse stock split of our then-outstanding Common Stock (“Reverse Stock Split”). Except as specifically provided, all share and per share amounts and related option and warrant information presented herein, including our financial statements and accompanying footnotes, has been retroactively adjusted to give effect to the Reverse Stock Split.

Summary of Risk Factors

An investment in our Company is subject to a number of risks, including risks relating to our business, and risks related to our Common Stock. Set forth below is a high-level summary of some, but not all, of these risks. You should review and consider carefully the risks and uncertainties described in more detail in “Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors” of this Annual Report, which includes a more complete discussion of the risks summarized below as well as a discussion of other risks related to our business and an investment in our Common Stock.

Risks Related to Our Financial Condition and Business

Risks Related to Our Common Stock

PART I

Item 1. Business.

Company Overview

RenX Enterprises Corp. is a Delaware corporation, originally formed in 2021 under the name SGB Development Corp., to engage in real property development using purpose-built, prefabricated modules constructed from both wood and steel. From our inception through 2023, our operations primarily focused on the acquisition, entitlement, and development of residential properties in high-growth markets across the United States. These efforts included the direct acquisition of land, strategic investments in real estate entities, and joint venture partnerships targeting green, single-family and multifamily housing projects.

In 2023 and early 2024, we expanded our strategy by investing in real estate-related artificial intelligence (“AI”) technologies and entering into additional joint ventures in the Southern Texas market aimed at developing sustainable single-family housing. Due to our shift in focus described below, we are no longer pursuing real estate AI related activities. We also announced plans to monetize our real estate holdings by selling properties where third-party appraisals indicated meaningful value appreciation, with proceeds to be reinvested in our current operations.

In June 2025, we completed our acquisition of Resource Group US Holdings LLC (“Resource Group”), which marked a significant strategic shift in our core business. Resource Group, through its subsidiaries, is a vertically integrated, full-service operator in the engineered soils and organic recycling industry. Its operations center on the transformation of targeted organic green waste materials into environmentally friendly soil and mulch products. Through our subsidiary, Zimmer Equipment Inc. (“ZEI”), we provide comprehensive waste logistics and collection services for our own products as well as for products of third parties through ZEI’s owned fleet of high-capacity transportation equipment and third-party contractors engaged by us. ZEI offers year-round collection and disposal services through high-capacity grapple trucks, open-top walking floor trailers, and variable-sized containers serving green waste generators, landscaping companies, golf courses, communities, and municipalities. Resource Group works with ZEI to streamline operations by internalizing certain transportation services, reducing over-the-road mileage, lowering disposal costs, and maximizing efficiency.

In addition to our organics processing and logistics operations, we are in the process of implementing the Microtec UTM 1200 Turbo Mill system at our Myakka City facility. The UTM 1200 is a high-efficiency milling and processing technology designed to enhance the throughput and output quality of our existing organics processing operations, including the production of engineered soils and mulch products. Phase 1 deployment is targeted for 2026 and is expected to meaningfully expand processing capacity at Myakka City. There can be no assurance that the UTM 1200 system will be deployed on the anticipated timeline or that it will perform as expected upon installation.

We currently operate in three segments: biomass recycling, logistics, and real estate. For the year ended December 31, 2025, we operated in four segments and generated $8,220,449 in revenue, of which approximately $5,935,296 was generated from our logistics business, $2,266,983 was generated from our biomass recycling business, and $18,170 was generated from our technology sector. While our logistics business operated by our subsidiary, ZEI, and our biomass recycling business operated by our subsidiary, Resource Group, are expected to serve as our primary operational focuses going forward, we also currently intend to continue to monetize our legacy real estate assets and joint venture interests.  

Biomass Recycling and Logistics Business

Resource Group Acquisition

On February 25, 2025, we entered into a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement (the “RG Purchase Agreement”) with Resource Group, a Florida limited liability company, and the members of Resource Group (the “RG Equityholders”), to acquire 100% of the membership interests of Resource Group.  Pursuant to the RG Purchase Agreement, the purchase price to be paid for the membership interests of Resource Group was to include $480,000 in cash, the issuance of shares of restricted Common Stock equal to 19% of our outstanding shares of Common Stock at closing and a convertible note in an amount to be determined at closing, convertible into shares of restricted Common Stock subject to the receipt of the approval of our stockholders post-closing in accordance with Nasdaq rules.

On June 2, 2025, we entered into an Amendment (the “Amendment”) to the RG Purchase Agreement. The Amendment altered the consideration to be paid by us in connection with our purchase of 100% of the membership interests of Resource Group. Pursuant to the Amendment, the purchase price for the membership interests of Resource Group was amended to be comprised of (i) unsecured 6% promissory notes in the aggregate principal amount of $480,000, due on the first anniversary of the closing, (ii) the issuance of such number of shares of restricted Common Stock equal to 19.99% of our outstanding shares of Common Stock on the date the RG Purchase Agreement was executed; and (iii) 1,500,000 shares of a newly designated series of non-voting Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series A Preferred Stock”). Pursuant to the Amendment, we also agreed to issue an aggregate of 41,182 additional shares of Common Stock (the “Additional RG Shares”) (2,509 as adjusted for the Reserve Split) to the RG Equityholders, subject to the approval of such issuance by our stockholders and provided that we continue to meet the Nasdaq continued listing requirements.

On June 2, 2025, we completed our acquisition of Resource Group and issued to the RG Equityholders, (i) an aggregate of 376,818 shares of the Common Stock (the “RG Closing Shares”), representing 19.99% of our issued and outstanding shares as of February 25, 2025; (ii) an aggregate of 1,500,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock (the “RG Preferred Shares”) (convertible into 9,000,000 shares of restricted Common Stock, the conversion of which was initially subject to the approval of our stockholders) (450,000 as adjusted for the Reserve Split) and which approval was obtained on September 29, 2025; and (iii) unsecured 6% promissory notes in the aggregate principal amount of $480,000 (the “RG Convertible Notes”).

In addition, in connection with the closing, Resource Group US LLC (“RG Group”) (which, prior to the closing, was a wholly owned subsidiary of Resource Group and now is our wholly owned subsidiary), issued an 11.5% note in the principal amount of $1,255,000 to James D. Burnham, a member of our Board of Directors and one of the founders of Resource Group, in consideration of funds he had previously advanced to RG Group. The note is due upon the earlier of April 30, 2026, immediately upon a change of control, or after the occurrence of an event of default.

On September 29, 2025, our stockholders approved the issuance of up to 9,000,000 shares (450,000 as adjusted for the Reserve Split) of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the RG Preferred Shares as well as the issuance of the 41,182 Additional RG Shares (2,509 as adjusted for the Reserve Split). The Additional RG Shares are expected to be issued in the Second Quarter of 2026.

In accordance with the terms of the Amendment, on June 17, 2025, our Board of Directors was reconstituted to consist of seven directors, four of which were existing directors of the Company, as designated by us, and three of which were designated by a majority in interest of the RG Equityholders. In connection therewith, Paul M. Galvin, Alyssa Richardson and Yaniv Blumenfeld each resigned as directors of the Company, and their board seats were filled by the new directors designated by the RG Equityholders. We believe that each director designated by the RG Equityholders has the relevant expertise and experience in business operations, finance, real estate development, or other applicable areas aligned with our goals.

The Amendment also required that on or prior to the twelve-month anniversary of the closing, we will use our best efforts to have on file with, and approved by, the SEC (subject to certain cut backs) an effective registration statement on Form S-1 or any other allowable form providing for the resale by the RG Equityholders on a pro rata basis of any Common Stock issued to them in connection with their conversion of shares of our Series A Preferred Stock.

Biomass Recycling and Logistics — Industry and Business Opportunity

We believe the biomass and recycling and logistics industries present timely and strategic opportunities for our company, particularly through our engagement with innovative waste-to-resource and supply chain optimization technologies. We have identified Resource Group’s suite of products and services as a valuable complement to our sustainability-driven business model. Their offerings include organic waste processing units, dewatering systems, and composting equipment designed for on-site use at universities, hospitals, municipalities, and private enterprises. These systems enable the efficient transformation of food and organic waste into usable compost, significantly reducing hauling costs and landfill dependency. Additionally, Resource Group is expanding into upcycling solutions that repurpose materials otherwise destined for disposal, transforming them into high-value products for commercial and industrial use. This aligns with circular economy principles and opens potential new revenue streams by converting waste into functional assets. In parallel, Resource Group is exploring logistics applications that enhance operational efficiency across waste and materials handling, including route optimization, on-site processing coordination, and supply chain integration for upcycled materials. Their turnkey services—which include installation, maintenance, and monitoring—help clients meet environmental goals and comply with evolving regulations. We view this business line as an important component of our long-term growth strategy and anticipate increased demand for the services they provide as organizations seek cost-effective, environmentally responsible, and logistically sound waste management and resource recovery solutions.

Competition

The market for biomass recycling, and related logistics technologies is highly competitive and rapidly evolving, driven by increasing regulatory pressure, expanding sustainability mandates, and a growing demand for environmentally conscious supply chain solutions. We recognize that Resource Group operates in a landscape populated by both established waste management firms and emerging clean technology companies offering composting, upcycling, and organic waste processing systems. However, Resource Group differentiates itself through its integrated, end-to-end solutions that include equipment, site-specific logistics planning, and ongoing operational support tailored for institutions such as universities, hospitals, and municipalities. While many competitors offer isolated components—such as equipment without service, or processing without logistics—Resource Group provides a unified approach that lowers total costs and maximizes efficiency. Resource Group’s focus on localized, decentralized solutions also gives Resource Group an edge over national waste firms that prioritize centralized processing, enabling clients to reduce transportation, emissions, and costs. We believe this positioning offers a strategic advantage as public and private sector clients increasingly seek agile, scalable, and sustainable alternatives to conventional waste and logistics models.

The market for bulk materials hauling and logistics in Florida is highly fragmented, characterized by a large number of regional and local carriers competing primarily on reliability, fleet capacity, driver availability, and customer relationships. ZEI competes with both independent owner-operators and mid-size regional trucking companies that serve construction, land clearing, and organics-adjacent customers. Competitive dynamics are influenced by driver availability, fuel costs, equipment utilization rates, and the ability to service high-volume, recurring contracts. Larger national carriers generally do not compete directly in the specialized local bulk hauling segment due to the short-haul, asset-intensive nature of the work. As with the broader logistics industry, participants in this segment face ongoing pressure from rising insurance premiums, commercial driver licensing requirements, hours-of-service regulations, and fuel cost volatility.

Regulatory Matters

Resource Group is subject to a range of federal, state, and local regulations that govern its waste management and environmental operations. At the federal level, applicable laws include the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”), which oversees the handling and disposal of solid and hazardous waste, as well as the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act, which may apply to emissions or discharges associated with organic material processing.

In Florida, where Resource Group is currently located and expects to continue to conduct business for the foreseeable future, we are primarily regulated by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (“FDEP”). The FDEP enforces state-specific regulations related to solid waste management, composting, and recycling, including permitting requirements, operational standards, and reporting obligations for facilities engaged in organic waste processing. Resource Group’s operations may also fall under Florida Administrative Code Chapters 62-701 (Solid Waste Management) and 62-709 (Composting Facilities), which establish the framework for compliance with design, siting, and performance standards.

At the local level, county and municipal governments in Florida may impose additional regulations through zoning ordinances, environmental health codes, and nuisance abatement standards. These can include rules related to odor control, vector prevention, and site-specific permitting or inspection processes.

Our logistics operations are also regulated and licensed by various U.S. federal and state governmental agencies. For example, they are subject to regulation by the Department of Transportation (the “DOT”) and its agency, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (the “FMCSA”). Ground transportation also falls under state jurisdiction with respect to the regulation of operations, safety and insurance. These, and other applicable regulations, impact us directly and also indirectly when they regulate third-party owner-operators we arrange and/or contract with to provide services to us and our customers.

We and the third-party owner-operators we contract with within the U.S. must comply with the safety and fitness regulations of the DOT, including, without limitation, those related to controlled substances, hours-of-service compliance, vehicle maintenance, hazardous materials compliance, driver fitness, unsafe driving, and minimum insurance requirements. Other federal and state agencies, such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, also regulate our equipment, operations, cargo and independent contractor drivers. We are also subject to various vehicle registration and licensing requirements in Florida. We may become subject to new or more restrictive regulations relating to emissions, independent contractor eligibility requirements and other matters affecting safety or operating methods. Additionally, our logistics operations and independent contractors are subject to various environmental laws and regulations in the jurisdictions where we operate. In the U.S., these laws and regulations deal with vehicle emissions, engine-idling, fuel tanks and related fuel spillage and seepage, discharge and retention of stormwater, and other environmental matters that involve inherent environmental risks. We may be responsible for cleaning up any spill or other incident involving hazardous materials caused by our business.

The failure to comply with these laws and regulations may adversely affect our ability to operate our vehicles. Compliance with changing regulations could substantially increase our costs. In addition, the Federal government may institute some regulation that limits carbon emissions by setting a maximum amount of carbon individual vehicles can emit without penalty, thus requiring us to replace noncompliant vehicles or to modify non-compliant vehicles. This would likely affect everyone who uses fossil fuels and would disproportionately affect users in the highway transportation industries. While there are too many variables at this time to assess the impact of the various proposed federal and state regulations that could affect carbon emissions, many experts believe these proposed rules could significantly affect the way companies operate in their businesses. 

Resource Group and ZEI are responsible for maintaining compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and continuously monitors regulatory developments in Florida that may affect its business operations.

Engineered Soils and Environmental Processing Industry

The U.S. biomass and recycling industry experienced continued growth in early 2025, driven by expanding demand across agricultural, commercial, and consumer end markets and increasing adoption of sustainable materials in land management and infrastructure applications. Several structural and economic factors continue to influence the industry, including:

The organic waste processing and diversion industry encompasses the collection, processing, and conversion of land clearing debris, vegetative waste, and other organic feedstocks into value-added end products including mulch, compost, and engineered soil blends. The global organic waste management market was valued at approximately $17.4 billion in 2024 and is projected to reach approximately $37.9 billion by 2034, g growing at a compound annual growth rate of approximately 8.1% (Source: Precedence Research / market.us). North America represents the largest regional market, accounting for approximately 44% of global market value. Demand is driven by increasing regulatory mandates requiring diversion of organic waste from landfills, growing municipal and commercial composting programs, and heightened emphasis on circular economy practices across the construction, agricultural, and landscaping sectors. In Florida, construction and demolition debris, which by state definition includes trees, vegetative matter, and soils resulting from land clearing operations, accounts for approximately 25% of the total municipal solid waste stream, generating sustained feedstock volumes for permitted processing facilities (Source: Florida Department of Environmental Protection).

The bulk substrate production segment, which includes locally-produced compost, mulch, and engineered soil blends derived from organic waste streams, competes with imported and mined alternatives such as Canadian sphagnum peat, virgin topsoil, and imported bark products. Domestically-produced, waste-derived substrates carry structural cost and logistics advantages in regional markets and are increasingly preferred by commercial and municipal buyers in response to supply chain disruptions, rising import costs, and procurement mandates favoring recycled-content materials. The global compost market was valued at approximately $6.7 billion in 2025, with North America accounting for approximately 30% of global market share (Source: Business Research Insights). The global soil amendments market, which includes compost, biosolids, and organic mulch products, was valued at approximately $19.6 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate of approximately 11.2% through 2030 (Source: Research and Markets), with recent U.S. tariff adjustments on imported amendment inputs creating additional competitive tailwinds for domestic producers of waste-derived substrates. Permitted organics processing facilities face significant barriers to entry including capital intensity, land requirements, and regulatory complexity, which constrain competitive supply in high-growth markets.

The bulk materials hauling and logistics industry encompasses the short-haul transport of construction aggregates, land clearing debris, mulch, engineered soils, fill material, and related bulk commodities between generation sites, processing facilities, municipal disposal sites, and end-use locations. Demand for bulk materials hauling is closely correlated with regional construction activity, land development volume, and the throughput requirements of permitted waste processing and recycling facilities. The Florida freight and logistics market was valued at approximately $78.3 billion in 2025 and is projected to reach approximately $97.1 billion by 2030, growing at a compound annual growth rate of approximately 4.5% (Source: Mordor Intelligence). Florida ranked among the most active construction markets in the United States in 2025, with approximately 100,945 new residential construction permits issued statewide for the year and aggregate monthly construction values consistently exceeding $2.0 billion (Source: HBW Reports). The bulk hauling segment within Florida is characterized by a high degree of fragmentation, with demand driven by population growth, sustained land clearing and development activity, expanding infrastructure investment, and the logistics requirements of the state’s organics processing and waste diversion sector. Participants compete primarily on fleet availability, driver reliability, regulatory compliance, and established customer relationships with construction contractors, municipalities, and processing facilities.

Real Estate Holdings

We are in the process of monetizing our legacy real estate holdings. Where third-party appraisals have indicated meaningful value appreciation, we intend to sell properties with proceeds to be reinvested in our current operations. Currently, the only remaining properties that we own or have an interest in are Norman Berry and McLean.

Lago Vista

On May 10, 2021, LV Peninsula Holding LLC (“LV Peninsula”), our wholly owned subsidiary, acquired a 50+ acre site on Lake Travis in Lago Vista, Texas for $3,500,000 in cash. LV Peninsula subsequently obtained approval to establish a planned development district consisting of 174 condominium units with an allowance for 30% short-term rental. Including project development costs of $824,231, the book value of the property was $4,400,361.

On January 6, 2026, we and Norman Berry II, LLC entered into a Restructuring and Collateral Agreement with Austerra to restructure the Company’s outstanding indebtedness of approximately $7.0 million (including accrued interest in excess of $750,000) originally issued by LV Peninsula Holding LLC (‘LV Peninsula”) and secured by the Lago Vista property. Pursuant to the Restructuring Agreement, LV Peninsula delivered a Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure conveying full title to the Lago Vista property to Austerra, conditionally extinguishing $5.0 million of the original secured debt. LV Peninsula also entered into a Loan Modification Agreement securing $2.0 million of the remaining balance with its property in Durant, Oklahoma, bearing interest at 13.50% per annum with interest-only payments for 12 months and a maturity date of December 1, 2028. In connection with the Deed in Lieu, LV Peninsula issued a conditional promissory note in the principal amount of $5,000,000, bearing interest at 13.50% per annum with a maturity date of December 1, 2028, which will automatically go into effect if, within 24 months: (i) the development, construction, flood-plain remediation, and all material improvements to the Lago Vista property have not been substantially completed, or (ii) the entire outstanding indebtedness owed to Austerra has not been paid in full. Upon any future sale of the Lago Vista property, the Company will receive 70% of net sale proceeds in excess of $5.0 million (plus any additional new funds provided, including accrued interest and/or penalties). We also pledged its 50% membership interest in Norman Berry and granted Austerra a security interest in a $209,333 promissory note payable by Norman Berry. All obligations are cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted across the Texas, Oklahoma, and Georgia properties.

South Texas Joint Ventures

Throughout 2024, we entered into a series of Joint Venture Agreements with Milk & Honey LLC, a Texas limited liability company (“Milk & Honey”), for the purpose of establishing a joint ventures to be conducted for the purpose of developing and constructing single-family homes in Edinburg, Texas.

On March 6, 2025, we entered into a Buyout Agreement with Properties by Milk & Honey, pursuant to which we agreed to sell our 60% membership interest in Sugar Phase I LLC, a joint venture (the “JV”) established under a Joint Venture Agreement with Milk & Honey, dated July 23, 2024, for a purchase price of $700,415.24, reflecting amounts contributed and costs incurred by us in connection with the Sugar Phase I project, and was issued a promissory note in the principal amount of $700,415.24, bearing interest at 10% per annum. Milk & Honey made four payments between March and September 2025, with the final payment received on September 12, 2025, satisfying all obligations under the Note. Upon receipt of the final payment, Milk & Honey acquired 100% of the membership interests in the JV.

Norman Berry Village

On May 31, 2021, we acquired a 50% membership interest for $600,000 in a limited liability company, NB Owners, that is building affordable housing in the Atlanta, Georgia metropolitan area to be known as “Norman Berry Village.” We partnered with CMC Development Group (“CMC”), a New York City-based real estate development firm with national expertise providing design build services. CMC owns the other 50% membership interest in NB Owners. The NB Owners’ operating agreement provides that NB Owners will initially have two managers, one designated by CMC (the “CMC Manager”) and one designated by us. Pursuant to the operating agreement, the CMC Manager will manage the day-to-day business and affairs of NB Owners and all non-routine decisions requires the approval of members owning a majority of the outstanding membership interests. The operating agreement also provides that any fee earned by CMC in connection with the acquisition and development of the Norman Berry Village and related real property will be split 75% to CMC and 25% to us. We have no obligation under the operating agreement to make any additional capital contributions to NB Owners. In addition, neither we nor CMC may voluntarily make any additional capital contributions to NB Owners. In accordance with the operating agreement, we are entitled to a preferred return equal to 10% per annum on our unreturned capital contributions which return will (i) accrue from the date on which our capital contributions were actually contributed to NB Owners until the date such capital contributions are returned to us, and (ii) compound annually. NB Owners received approval from the city of Eastpoint to purchase the right of way approval to begin developing the Norman Berry Village. On March 11, 2024, NB Owners, pursuant to a loan agreement dated March 11, 2022, issued a promissory note (the “First Lien Note”) in the amount of $200,000. The First Lien Note matured on March 11, 2025 and provides for interest only payments at a rate of 12%. To secure the full payment of the First Lien Note, the note is secured by a security deed in the NB Owners property.

On January 16, 2026, we entered into a Second Lien Promissory Note (the “Second Lien Note”) with NB Owners in the principal amount of $599,000 to memorialize the fund previously advanced, contributed, or expended by us into or for the benefit of the NB Owners property and the Norman Berry Village project. No new funds were advanced in connection with the execution and delivery of the Second Lien Note. The Second Lien Note matures 90 days from its issuance date, and bears interest at a rate of 3.81% per annum, calculated on the basis of a 360-day year, with the entire unpaid principal, accrued interest, and all other amounts due payable in a single balloon payment at maturity. The Second Lien Note is secured by a second-priority lien on the NB Owners property, subordinate to the First Lien Note. The First Lien Note matured on March 11, 2025 and, as of the date of this filing, remains outstanding and in default. The Company is the holder of both the First Lien Note and the Second Lien Note and, as a result of the default under the First Lien Note, has the right to foreclose on the NB Owners property. In addition, the property has been listed for sale. Upon the occurrence of a sale, if any, we are entitled to repayment on our liens of $200,000 and $599,000 plus applicable interest as well as 50% of the remaining profits.

Cumberland Inlet

On June 24, 2021, we, as a member, entered into an Operating Agreement, with Jacoby Development, Inc., a Georgia corporation (“JDI”), as manager, dated June 24, 2021 (the “Operating Agreement”), for JDI-Cumberland Inlet, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company (“JDI-Cumberland”), pursuant to which we acquired a 10% non-dilutable equity interest (“LLC Interest”) in JDI-Cumberland for $3,000,000. JDI-Cumberland has purchased a 1,298 acre waterfront parcel in downtown historic St. Mary’s, Georgia and expects to develop approximately 352 acres thereof (the “Cumberland Inlet Project”). We, in conjunction with JDI, expected to develop a mixed-use destination community. The location will serve as home to 3,500 units made up of single family, multi-family, vacation and hospitality use, as well as a full-service marina, village, and upscale Eco-Tourism park inclusive of camping, yurts, cabins and cottages. JDI-Cumberland recently received all approvals to build out the marina portion of the project.

In May of 2025, JDI Cumberland filed for bankruptcy and as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K we have not received any proceeds from the bankruptcy proceedings.

St Mary’s Site

On August 18, 2022, we purchased, for $296,870 approximately 27 acres of land (“St Mary’s Site”) adjacent to our Cumberland Inlet Project from the Camden County Joint Development Authority (“JDA)”.

On January 31, 2024, we entered into an Agreement of Sale with Pigmental Studios to sell the St. Mary’s Site. On October 14, 2024, we entered into a Modification Agreement with Palermo Lender LLC (“Palermo”), effective as of October 2, 2024 (the “Modification Agreement”), to modify the Deed of Trust (the “Security Deed”) securing our promissory note issued to Palermo in the original principal amount of $148,300.00, as subsequently modified to increase the principal amount to $200,000.00, to extend the maturity date to March 1, 2025 and to change the interest rate from 10.99% with ACH to 11.99% without ACH.

On November 13, 2024 we entered into an amendment to the Agreement of Sale (the “Second Amendment”) that amended the closing date to November 15, 2024 and increased the purchase price to $1,400,000 payable $439,328 in cash and $960,672 by the issuance of a promissory note to us. The promissory note bore 10% interest per annum, provided for monthly interest payments and originally matured on March 15, 2025 with the option to extend up to three times by paying $10,000 for each extension.

During December 2025, the Company entered into a payoff agreement for such note, which resulted in full satisfaction of the outstanding note. In connection with the payoff, the Company received $280,000 and recorded a loss on notes receivable in the amount of $818,172.

McLean Mixed Use Site

On November 10, 2021, we entered into a Purchase Agreement (“Purchase Agreement) with the Durant Industrial Authority to acquire 100% ownership of approximately 114 mixed-use acres in Durant, Oklahoma for $868,000. We anticipated building approximately 800 residential units and up to 1.1 million square feet of industrial manufacturing space on the mixed-use property. The closing on the 114 mixed-use acres occurred in the first quarter of 2022. We had planned to build a 120,000 square foot state of the art manufacturing facility. The property is zoned for an additional 1.0 million square feet of industrial space.

As of March 31, 2026, we expect to subdivide our McLean property into buildable single family lots that can subsequently be sold to developers or developed internally. We analyzed market conditions and determined that this process is expected to yield the highest return without having to take on construction related risks. We are currently in discussions with the Durant Industrial Authority (“DIA”) regarding a conveyance of the McLean Mixed Use Site, in connection with a Lis Pendens filed against the property by the DIA..

AI and Software Development Projects

As stated above, we are no longer pursuing real estate AI related activities and have ceased operations of the AI Platforms.

AI Platform Acquisition

Majestic

On February 7, 2024, we entered into a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement (“MIPA”) to acquire Majestic World Holdings LLC (“Majestic”). Majestic is a prop-tech company that has created an AI software platform (the “AI Powered Platform”). The AI Powered Platform, which was launched in April 2024, aims to decentralize the real estate marketplace.

Pursuant to the terms of the MIPA, as amended, and a related side letter in consideration of our membership interest purchase we (i) on February 7, 2024 we issued 500,000 shares of Common Stock (1,000 as adjusted for the Reserve Split and prior split) to the members of Majestic, and (ii) to paid 154,675 in cash to the members of Majestic In addition, pursuant to a profit sharing agreement entered into as of February 7, 2024 (the “Profit Sharing Agreement”), we agreed to pay the former members of Majestic a 50% share of the net profits for a period of five years that are directly derived from the technology and intellectual property utilized in the real estate focused software as a service offered and operated by Majestic and its subsidiaries.

On the final payment date the remaining 31.75% interest in Majestic was transferred to us.

MyVonia

On June 6, 2024, we completed the acquisition of all of the assets related to the AI technology known as My Virtual Online Intelligent Assistant (“MyVONIA”) pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 7, 2024, by and between us and Dr. Axely Congress (the “APA”). MyVONIA, is an advanced AI assistant, that utilizes machine learning and natural language processing algorithms to provide users with human-like conversational interactions, tailored to their specific needs.

The APA provides that the purchase price for MyVONIA is up to 500,000 shares of Common Stock (1,250 as adjusted for the Reserve Split and prior split). Of such shares, 500 shares of Common Stock were issued at the closing on June 6, 2024, with an additional 750 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the achievement of certain benchmarks, which benchmarks have not been met and therefore the additional 750 shares of Common Stock have not been issued. Pursuant to the APA, Dr. Congress has agreed to a non-compete. In connection with the closing, Dr. Congress also entered into a consulting agreement with us (the “Consulting Agreement”) to continue to develop MyVONIA and provide such other services as are required pursuant thereto under which Dr. Congress will receive a consulting fee of $10,000 a month. The Consulting Agreement has a term of two years and has a non-compete. For additional information regarding the MyVONIA acquisition, see Note 9 — Business Combination and Acquisition of Assets to the Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report.

Competition

We face competition in the real estate development and housing industries. Real estate developers compete for, among other things, residents, desirable land parcels, financing, raw materials, and skilled labor. Increased competition may prevent us from acquiring attractive land parcels or make such acquisitions more expensive, hinder our market share expansion, or lead to pricing pressures that may adversely impact our margins and revenues. Competitors may independently develop land and construct housing units that are superior or substantially similar to our products and because they are or may be significantly larger, have a longer operating history, and have greater resources or lower cost of capital than us, may be able to compete more effectively in one or more of the markets in which we operate or plan to operate. We believe we can distinguish ourselves from our competitors on the basis of our quality and construction time savings.

Regulation and Environmental Matters

Our real estate investments are subject to extensive local, city, county and state rules and regulations regarding permitting, zoning, subdivision, utilities and water quality as well as federal rules and regulations regarding air and water quality, and protection of endangered species and their habitats. Such regulation may delay development of our properties and may result in higher development and administrative costs. See “Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” for further discussion.

We have made, and will continue to make, expenditures for the protection of the environment with respect to our real estate development activities. Emphasis on environmental matters will result in additional costs in the future. Further, regulatory and societal responses intended to reduce potential climate change impacts may increase our costs to develop, operate and maintain our properties. Based on an analysis of our operations in relation to current and presently anticipated environmental requirements, we currently do not anticipate that these costs will have a material adverse effect on our future operations or financial condition.

Sustainability

We are committed to protecting the environment and to sustainable operations. We emphasize responsible materials processing, waste diversion, and environmentally conscious practices across our organics processing and logistics operations.

Human Capital

As of the date hereof, we employed a total of 38 individuals across the Company and our two principal operating subsidiaries, Resource Group and ZEI. Of our total workforce, 36 employees are employed on a full-time basis and 2 are employed on a part-time basis. None of our employees are represented by a labor union or covered by a collective bargaining agreement.

At the parent company level, we employ 4 full-time individuals, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Senior In-House Counsel, and Vice President of Development.

Resource Group employs 14 individuals, of which, 12 are full-time and 2 are part-time. Resource Group’s workforce is primarily composed of field operations personnel, including 7 operators, 1 mechanic, 1 lead mechanic, 1 mechanic/welder, and 1 driver. Administrative and management functions are supported by 1 vice president of operations, 1 clerical employee, and 1 office administrator.

ZEI employs 20 individuals, all of whom are full-time. ZEI’s workforce is concentrated in transportation and logistics, with 11 drivers comprising the majority of its headcount. ZEI also employs 2 welders, 2 dispatchers, 1 yard assistant, 1 sales representative, 1 office manager, 1 administrative employee, and 1 vice president of operations.

Corporate Information

We were incorporated in Delaware on February 27, 2021 under the name SGB Development Corp., which was later changed to Safe and Green Development Corporation in December 2022. On December 19, 2025, we changed our name to RenX Enterprises Corp. Our principal executive office is located at 1111 Brickell Ave., Floor 11, Suite 109, Miami, Florida 33131, and our phone number is (786) 808-5776. We maintain a website at www.renxent.com. The reference to our website is intended to be an inactive textual reference only. The information contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website is not part of this Annual Report.

In December 2022, SG Holdings, the then owner of 100% of our issued and outstanding securities, announced its plan to separate our Company and SG Holdings into two separate publicly traded companies (the “Separation”). To implement the Separation, on September 27, 2023 (the “Distribution Date”), SG Holdings, effected a pro rata distribution to SG Holdings’ stockholders of approximately 30% of the outstanding shares of our Common Stock (the “Distribution”). In connection with the Distribution, each SG Holdings’ stockholder received 0.930886 shares of our Common Stock for every five (5) shares of SG Holdings common stock held as of the close of business on September 8, 2023, the record date for the Distribution, as well as a cash payment in lieu of any fractional shares. Immediately after the Distribution, we were no longer a wholly owned subsidiary of SG Holdings and SG Holdings held approximately 70% of our issued and outstanding securities. On September 28, 2023, our Common Stock began trading on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “SGD.”

Effective December 19, 2025, we changed our name to RenX Enterprises Corp. (the “Name Change”). The Name Change was effected by our filing of a Certificate of Amendment (the “Certificate of Amendment”) to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (the “Amended and Restated Certificate”) with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware. In addition, effective December 19, 2025, we amended and restated our Amended and Restated Bylaws (the “Bylaws”) to reflect the Name Change and to incorporate all prior amendments into the Bylaws (the “Second Amended and Restated Bylaws”).

Our Common Stock has traded on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “RENX” since our name change on December 19, 2025.

Implications of Being an Emerging Growth Company

We qualify as an “emerging growth company” as defined under the Securities Act. As a result, we are permitted to, and intend to, rely on exemptions from certain disclosure requirements that are otherwise applicable to public companies. These provisions include, but are not limited to:

In addition, an emerging growth company can take advantage of an extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards. This provision allows an emerging growth company to delay the adoption of some accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We have elected to avail ourselves of this extended transition period. We will remain an emerging growth company until the earliest to occur of: (i) our reporting $1.235 billion or more in annual gross revenues; (ii) the end of fiscal year 2028; (iii) our issuance, in a three year period, of more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt; and (iv) the last day of the fiscal year in which we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer, which generally means that we have been public for at least 12 months, have filed at least one annual report, and the market value of our Common Stock that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the last day of our then-most recently completed second fiscal quarter.

We have elected to take advantage of certain of the reduced disclosure obligations and may elect to take advantage of other reduced reporting requirements in future filings. As a result, the information that we provide to our stockholders may be different than the information you might receive from other public reporting companies in which you hold equity interests.

Smaller Reporting Company

We also qualify as a “smaller reporting company,” as such term is defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act, and to the extent we continue to qualify as a “smaller reporting company,” after we cease to qualify as an “emerging growth company,” certain of the exemptions available to us as an “emerging growth company” may continue to be available to us as a smaller reporting company, including: (1) not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act; (2) scaled executive compensation disclosures; and (3) the ability to provide only two years of audited financial statements, instead of three years.

Available Information

We are subject to the informational requirements of the Exchange Act, and in accordance therewith, we file reports, proxy and information statements and other information with the SEC. You can read our SEC filings over the Internet at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Our filings with the SEC are also available free of charge through the investor relations section of our website at www.renxent.com. Reports are available free of charge as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file them with, or furnish them to, the SEC. From time to time, we also use multiple social media channels to communicate with the public about RenX. It is possible that the information we post on social media could be deemed to be material information. Therefore, we encourage you to review the information we post on the social media channels listed on our investor relations website, if any.

Information contained on or accessible through the websites and social media channels referred to above is not incorporated by reference in, or otherwise a part of, this Annual Report, and any references to these websites and social media channels are intended to be inactive textual references only.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Investing in our Common Stock involves a high degree of risk. You should consider carefully the following risks, together with all the other information in this Annual Report, including the section titled “Forward-Looking Statements,” and “Part II, Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report. The risks described below are not the only ones we face. Any of the following risks could materially and adversely affect our business. If any of the following risks actually materializes, our operating results, financial condition and liquidity could be materially adversely affected. References to past events are provided by way of example only and are not intended to be a complete listing or a representation as to whether or not such factors have occurred in the past or their likelihood of occurring in the future. As a result, the trading price of our Common Stock could decline and you could lose part or all of your investment. Our business, financial condition and results of operations could also be harmed by risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently do not believe are material.

Risks Related to Our Financial Condition

Our limited operating history makes it difficult for us to evaluate our future business prospects.

We were incorporated in February 2021. We cannot assure you that we will be able to operate our business successfully or profitably or find additional suitable investments. We only have a few years of audited financial statements. Any investment decision will not be made with the same data as would be available as if we had a longer history of public reporting. There can be no assurance that we will be able to generate sufficient revenue from operations to pay our operating expenses. The results of our operations and the execution on our business plan depends primarily on the demand for the recycling and composting services, logistics services and, to a lesser extent, the performance of our currently held properties, competition, our ability to monetize our real estate business, the availability of adequate equity and debt financing, and conditions in the financial markets and economic conditions.

You should consider our business and prospects in light of the risks and significant challenges we face as a new entrant into our industry. If we fail to adequately address any or all of these risks and challenges, our business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows may be materially and adversely affected.

We have entered into new lines of business which may not be successful.

In June 2025, in connection with our acquisition of Resource Group and ZEI, we entered into two new lines of business transforming targeted organic green waste materials into engineered, environmentally friendly soil and mulch products, and logistics. There can be no assurance that there will be demand for our services in these markets. Even if such a market develops, there can be no assurance that we would be able to maintain that market.

Our auditors have expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

We have generated limited revenue and have incurred significant net losses in each year since inception. For the year ended December 31, 2025 we incurred a net loss of $15,957,099 as compared to a net loss of $8,908,475 for the year ended December 31, 2024. We expect to continue to incur operating losses as we scale our organics processing and logistics operations, invest in equipment and infrastructure, and work toward achieving profitability across our business segments. We cannot offer any assurance as to our future financial results. Our inability to achieve profitability from our current operating plans or to raise capital to cover any potential shortfall would have a material adverse effect on our ability to meet our obligations as they become due. If we are not able to secure additional funding, if, and when needed, we would be forced to curtail our operations or take other action in order to continue to operate. A significant portion of our funding for operations has been from debt and equity financings and not revenue generated from operations. These and other factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The auditor’s report included in this Annual Report contains an explanatory paragraph regarding our ability to continue as a going concern. If we are unable to generate sufficient revenue to meet our operating needs and are unable to meet our obligations and are forced to curtail or cease our business operations, our stockholders could suffer a complete loss of any investment made in our securities.

Our business strategy includes growth plans. Our financial condition and results of operations could be negatively affected if we fail to grow or fail to manage our growth or investments effectively.

Our prospects must be considered in light of the risks, expenses and difficulties frequently encountered by companies in significant growth stages of development. We cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully grow our compost or logistics businesses or successfully monetize or generate sales proceeds from our real estate properties. Failure to manage potential transactions to successful conclusions, or failure more generally to manage our growth effectively, could have a material adverse effect on our business, future prospects, financial condition or results of operations and could adversely affect our ability to successfully implement our business strategy.

We will need to raise additional capital to support our long-term business plans and our failure to obtain funding when needed may force us to delay, reduce or eliminate our operational and business plans.

During the year ended December 31, 2025, our operating activities used net cash of approximately $7 million and as of December 31, 2025, our cash was $54,066. We have experienced significant losses since inception and have a significant accumulated deficit as of December 31, 2025, totaling approximately $32 million. We expect to incur additional operating losses in the future and therefore expect our cumulative losses to increase. To date, we have not derived substantial revenue from the properties we own or have an interest in. We expect to potentially generate revenue through our growth of our compost and logistics businesses and sales of property, if any. There is uncertainty as to our ability to monetize our real estate properties or to generate sales proceeds. We expect our expenses to increase as operations increase from our compost and logistics businesses.

Although in October 2025 we raised approximately $9,000,000 and in February 2026 we raised approximately $6,000,000, unless we generate significant revenue from our compost and logistics businesses, we believe we will need to raise additional capital to fund our business expansion plans and we cannot be certain that funding will be available to us on acceptable terms on a timely basis, or at all. To meet our financing needs, we are considering multiple alternatives, including, but not limited to, additional equity and debt financings. Our ability to raise capital through the sale of securities may be limited by our number of authorized shares of Common Stock and various rules of the SEC and Nasdaq that place limits on the number and dollar amount of securities that we may sell. Any additional sources of financing will likely involve the issuance of our equity or debt securities, which will have a dilutive effect on our stockholders, assuming we are able to sufficiently increase our authorized number of shares of Common Stock. To the extent that we raise additional funds by issuing equity securities, our stockholders may experience significant dilution. Any debt financing, if available, may involve restrictive covenants that may impact our ability to conduct our business. Our current outstanding debentures prohibit us from engaging in certain types of financing while the debentures are outstanding. If we fail to raise additional funds on acceptable terms, we may be unable to complete planned development work.

We previously identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting and we may, in the future, identify additional material weaknesses or otherwise fail to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting or adequate disclosure controls and procedures, which may result in material errors in our financial statements or cause us to fail to meet our period reporting obligations.

Management and our Audit Committee, in consultation with M&K CPAS PLLC (“M&K”), our independent registered public accounting firm, determined that there was a material weaknesses in our internal controls as of June 30, 2025, which was remediated as of December 31, 2025. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of a company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The material weakness in our case related to the ineffective design of certain management review controls across a portion of the Company’s financial statements. Specifically, the controls related to the review of internal and externally prepared reports and analysis utilized in the financial reporting process of outside consultants that aid in the preparation of our financial statements. In order to remediate these material weaknesses, we added more external consultants to assist in the preparation of our financial statements, and assist in the expansion of our accounting and finance department as a result of our recent acquisition.

Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended, our management is required to report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. The rules governing the standards that must be met for management to assess our internal control over financial reporting are complex and require significant documentation, testing and possible remediation. Annually, we perform activities that include reviewing, documenting and testing our internal control over financial reporting. In addition, if we fail to maintain the adequacy of our internal control over financial reporting, we will not be able to conclude on an ongoing basis that we have effective internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. If we fail to achieve and maintain an effective internal control environment, we could suffer misstatements in our financial statements and fail to meet our reporting obligations, which would likely cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information. This could result in significant expenses to remediate any internal control deficiencies and lead to a decline in our stock price.

We cannot provide assurance that we have identified all, or that we will not in the future have additional, material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. As a result, we may be required to implement further remedial measures and to design enhanced processes and controls to address deficiencies. If we do not effectively remediate the material weaknesses identified by management and maintain adequate internal controls over financial reporting in the future, we may not be able to prepare reliable financial reports and comply with our reporting obligations under the Exchange Act on a timely basis. Any such delays in the preparation of financial reports and the filing of our periodic reports may result in a loss of public confidence in the reliability of our financial statements, which, in turn, could materially adversely affect our business, the market value of our common stock and our access to capital markets.

A prolonged U.S. federal government shutdown could materially and adversely affect our business and operations.

Any disruption in the operations of the U.S. government, including as a result of the recent or future temporary or prolonged shutdowns resulting from the failure of Congress to enact appropriations bills or raise the federal debt ceiling, could materially and adversely affect our business, operations and financial condition. Recently, beginning on October 1, 2025, the U.S. federal government shut down and remained shut down through November 12, 2025, and again beginning on January 31, 2026 through February 3, 2026, during which times certain regulatory agencies, such as the FDA and the SEC, furloughed critical employees and stopped critical activities. During such shutdowns, while the SEC’s EDGAR system remains operational, the unavailability of the SEC staff to review filings, issue and resolve comments, or declare registration statements effective may delay our ability to complete public offerings and obtain timely regulatory approvals. These delays could impact our access to capital markets, hinder strategic transactions, and create uncertainty around our disclosure obligations. Additionally, the lack of interpretive guidance or exemptive relief during a shutdown may increase legal and compliance risks. There can be no assurance that future shutdowns will not materially affect our operations or financial condition.

Federal budget and debt-ceiling disputes may adversely affect capital markets and our financing activities.

Moreover, the uncertainty surrounding government funding debates and debt-ceiling negotiations can negatively affect market conditions, investor sentiment, and the liquidity of small-cap and microcap issuers such as ours. If market volatility or trading disruptions were to occur during the current or future government shutdowns, our ability to execute at-the-market offerings or other financing transactions under our effective shelf registration statement or through private equity offerings could be materially impaired.

Accordingly, any federal government shutdown or protracted budget impasse could materially and adversely affect our regulatory compliance, financing options and capabilities, and overall financial condition.

Under the February 2026 Purchase Agreement, we are subject to certain restrictive covenants that may make it difficult to procure additional financing.

The February 2026 Purchase Agreement contains, among others, the following restrictive covenants: (A) from the date of the Purchase Agreement between us and certain investors until 30 days following the later of (a) the earliest of the date that (i) the initial registration statement registering for resale all shares issuable upon conversion of the 2026 Notes (the “Conversion Shares”) has been declared effective by the SEC, (ii) all of the Conversion Shares and February Warrant Shares have been sold pursuant to Rule 144 or may be sold pursuant to Rule 144 without the requirement for the Company to be in compliance with the current public information required under Rule 144 and without volume or manner-of-sale restrictions, (iii) following the one year anniversary of the Closing Date provided that a holder of Conversion Shares and October Warrant Shares is not an affiliate of us, or (iv) all of the Shares and February Warrant Shares may be sold pursuant to an exemption from registration under Section 4(a)(1) of the Securities Act without volume or manner-of-sale restrictions and counsel to us has delivered to such holders a standing written unqualified opinion that resales may then be made by such holders of the Conversion Shares and February Warrant Shares pursuant to such exemption which opinion shall be in form and substance reasonably acceptable to such holders; we may not issue, enter into any agreement to issue or announce the issuance or proposed issuance of any shares of Common Stock or common stock equivalents or file any registration statement or amendment or supplement thereto other than a registration statement providing for the resale of the Warrant Shares and the shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the Notes (the “Conversion Shares”), subject to certain other limited exceptions.

If we require additional funding while these restrictive covenants remain in effect, we may be unable to effect a financing transaction on terms acceptable to us, or at all, while also remaining in compliance with the terms of the October Purchase Agreement, or we may be forced to seek a waiver from the investor party to the October Purchase Agreement, which such investor is not obligated to grant to us.

Additionally, the October Purchase Agreement requires us to hold a meeting of our stockholders at the earliest practicable date (and in no event later than 60 days after the closing) to seek stockholder approval and, if such approval is not obtained at the initial meeting, to hold a second meeting on or prior to the 60th calendar day following such meeting, and thereafter every 90 days to seek stockholder approval until the earlier of the date stockholder approval is obtained or December 31, 2026, whichever is sooner, which may be time consuming and costly.

Risks Related to Engineered Biomass and Organic Recycling

We are subject to extensive environmental laws and regulations that may increase our operating costs or expose us to liability.

Our engineered soils, remediation, and logistics operations involve the handling, transport, and processing of materials that are subject to federal, state, and local environmental laws and regulations. These include those governing air emissions, water discharges, solid and hazardous waste, and site remediation. Compliance with these laws may require significant capital expenditures, administrative resources, and operating restrictions. Any actual or alleged failure to comply could result in civil or criminal penalties, project delays, or reputational harm. In addition, we may be held liable under strict liability statutes such as the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), even for contamination not caused by our own operations.

Changes in environmental laws and standards may impose additional costs and limitations on our operations.

Legislative and regulatory changes related to climate change, PFAS contamination, soil quality, and permitting frameworks may materially impact our business. For example, more stringent discharge thresholds or reclassification of materials we handle could require us to retrofit existing equipment, modify site operations, or alter how we transport and process soils. These changes could limit our ability to obtain or renew environmental permits or require significant new investments to remain in compliance.

We face risks associated with seasonality and weather that may impact our operations and revenue.

Our engineered soils, remediation, and logistics services are subject to seasonal demand and may be significantly affected by weather conditions. Adverse weather, including heavy rain, storms, or flooding, can delay project start times, suspend field operations, reduce hauling efficiency, or result in temporary site closures. These disruptions can negatively affect backlog conversion, customer satisfaction, and quarterly revenue variability.

Our biomass and recycling and organic recycling business is performed in one state, Florida.

To date, ZEI has only performed services in the State of Florida and its business is subject to catastrophic weather and other natural events from time to time. If weather conditions in Florida prevent us from fulfilling purchase orders, we do not have a back up location and our revenue will be impacted.

Our operations are concentrated at a single permitted facility, and any disruption to that facility could severely impair our biomass recycling business.

Substantially all of our biomass recycling operations are conducted at our permitted organics processing facility in Myakka City, Florida. We do not currently operate any secondary processing facilities. A disruption at the Myakka City facility — including as a result of fire, equipment failure, severe weather, flooding, or regulatory action — could render us unable to accept feedstock, process organic waste, or produce and deliver finished engineered soil and mulch products. Any extended shutdown of the Myakka City facility would materially impair our biomass recycling revenue and could result in the loss of customer relationships and permit standing that would be difficult to recover. We do not currently maintain business interruption insurance that we believe would fully offset the financial impact of a prolonged shutdown. The concentration of our processing operations at a single location represents a significant operational risk that is not present in businesses operating multiple facilities.

Our biomass recycling operations are entirely dependent on maintaining permits issued by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, and any revocation, suspension, or modification of those permits could halt our operations.

Resource Group operates the Myakka City facility under permits issued by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (“FDEP”) that authorize the receipt, processing, and distribution of organic waste and related materials. Our ability to conduct biomass recycling operations is entirely dependent on maintaining these permits in good standing. FDEP permits are subject to renewal, modification, suspension, and revocation based on compliance history, changes in environmental regulations, community complaints, permit condition violations, and regulatory priorities. The permitting framework governing composting and organic waste processing facilities in Florida has become increasingly scrutinized, and future regulatory changes could impose additional operating conditions or restrict the volume or types of materials we are permitted to process. If any of our FDEP permits were suspended, revoked, or materially modified, we could be required to curtail or cease operations at the Myakka City facility, which would have an immediate and material adverse effect on our revenues, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our business is dependent on a limited number of municipal and government contracts, which may be subject to political and funding risks.

A portion of our revenue derives from government contracts for soil remediation, infrastructure support, and materials supply. These contracts are awarded through competitive bidding and may be subject to delays, renegotiation, or cancellation based on budget availability, political changes, or performance-based reviews. The loss of any significant municipal or agency customer or failure to win expected bids could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our real estate holdings and facility operations require significant capital, management, and regulatory compliance.

We own and lease several properties that house soil processing, storage, and remediation activities. These properties must comply with zoning, permitting, and environmental requirements, and require continuous investment for maintenance, safety, and operational efficiency. If we are unable to operate these facilities profitably or repurpose them for alternative uses, we may not achieve an acceptable return on our invested capital.

Our business relies on skilled labor, specialized equipment, and operational execution to meet customer demands.

The success of our soil processing and remediation operations depends on access to qualified personnel and properly functioning, specialized equipment. Labor shortages, particularly in field services or trucking, including as a result of immigration policies, may constrain our ability to meet project schedules. Furthermore, we have faced challenges hiring employees in our compost business due to the remote location of our facilities. Equipment downtime, supply delays, or execution failures may increase project costs, reduce customer satisfaction, or delay revenue recognition.

Our logistics operations depend on a small number of licensed commercial drivers, and the loss of key drivers or an inability to recruit qualified replacements could materially impair our transportation capacity.

ZEI’s logistics operations are staffed by a workforce of 20 full-time employees, 11 of whom are CDL-licensed commercial drivers. These drivers operate our fleet of grapple trucks, walking floor trailers, and other heavy equipment, and their availability is directly tied to our ability to fulfill customer commitments. The market for CDL-licensed drivers is highly competitive and subject to persistent shortages driven by an aging driver workforce, stringent licensing requirements, and competition from larger carriers offering higher compensation. The loss of two or three experienced drivers could meaningfully reduce ZEI’s operational throughput. We cannot assure you that we will be able to attract and retain a sufficient number of qualified CDL drivers to support our operations, particularly as we seek to grow our logistics volume. If we are unable to maintain adequate driver staffing, our ability to service customers, generate logistics revenue, and support the transportation needs of our biomass recycling operations would be materially and adversely affected.

Our processing and transportation operations depend on a fleet of specialized equipment financed through multiple lenders, and the unavailability of equipment or equipment financing could impair our operational capacity.

Our biomass recycling and logistics operations are dependent on a fleet of specialized processing equipment and transportation vehicles, including trommel screeners, grinders, shredders, grapple trucks, and trailers. As of December 31, 2025, this equipment is financed through approximately fifteen separate equipment finance facilities with multiple lenders. Our ability to conduct operations is contingent on this equipment remaining in good working order, replacement parts being available, and our equipment financing facilities remaining in effect. If we default on any equipment finance obligations, lenders may repossess the collateralized equipment, directly impairing operational capacity. Additionally, if our financial condition deteriorates, we may be unable to refinance maturing equipment facilities or obtain financing for necessary equipment replacements or additions. The loss of access to key pieces of processing or transportation equipment even temporarily could disrupt customer service, reduce throughput, and materially and adversely affect our revenues and results of operations.

Our logistics business involves safety risks and the materialization of such risks will affect our business operations and financial results.

Transportation is a key component of our logistics business and involves inherent safety risks, which may not be eliminated through implementing the current risk management policies and control measures, such as safety inspections on our vehicles and safety awareness training for our drivers. The provision of our logistics services may present risks and dangers, such as improper operation of vehicles, vehicle or equipment failure and other issues arising from driving. The materialization of any of such risks may result in personal injury, business disruption or negative impact on our business.

Our trucking operations involve complex logistics that may be disrupted by operational, regulatory, or market conditions.

Our business includes operating and coordinating a fleet of trucks to transport green waste, engineered soils, and other bulk materials between job sites and our processing facilities. These operations require reliable scheduling, routing, and maintenance systems to ensure timely and compliant deliveries. We rely on third-party owner-operators of vehicles to perform certain of our logistics services, and loss of any such third-party owner-operators, or our inability to engage additional third-party owner-operators as our business grows, could negatively impact our results of operations and financial condition. Disruptions such as driver shortages, increased costs to engage third-party owner operators when needed, increased regulatory oversight on vehicle emissions or weight limits, limited availability of replacement parts, or road access restrictions may negatively impact our efficiency and increase costs. In addition, failure to maintain Department of Transportation compliance, vehicle safety records, or insurance coverage could result in fines or suspension of operations.

We face operational, regulatory, and economic risks associated with green waste projects.

Green waste handling and processing, including the receipt, sorting, and reuse of organic materials such as yard clippings, branches, and wood debris, are subject to environmental and permitting regulations. These projects may involve odor control, vector management, and contamination risks that require specialized handling and site management protocols. Changes in organic waste diversion mandates, composting regulations, or material classification standards may affect our ability to process or resell green waste economically. Additionally, fluctuations in demand from end-markets such as compost facilities, biomass plants, or soil amendment users may limit our ability to monetize collected material, which could increase storage costs or disposal expenses.

Disruptions in the supply chain for key inputs could adversely affect our operations.

Our operations rely heavily on a consistent and cost-effective supply of organic feedstocks and amendments such as yard waste, food scraps, biosolids, wood chips, and bulking agents, many of which are subject to seasonal availability, local collection programs, and third-party contracts. Any disruption to this supply chain—caused by extreme weather events, transportation bottlenecks, labor shortages, or geopolitical instability—could constrain production, increase costs, and impact our ability to meet contractual obligations or serve growing markets.

Compliance with environmental regulations is costly and subject to change.

The engineered soils and composting industry is subject to complex environmental regulations at the federal, state, and local levels, governing areas such as permitting, emissions, stormwater runoff, leachate control, and zoning. Maintaining compliance with these laws requires ongoing investments in monitoring, equipment, and staff training, and changes in regulations—such as stricter air or water standards—could increase operating costs or limit expansion. Failure to comply with such regulations could result in fines, permit revocation, or reputational harm.

Environmental liabilities from contamination or hazardous substances may expose us to financial risk.

The presence of persistent environmental contaminants such as PFAS chemicals or heavy metals in feedstocks or end products presents significant liability risks. These substances, even in trace amounts, may lead to regulatory enforcement, litigation, or cleanup costs if found in compost products, surrounding soil, or water. As environmental scrutiny increases, particularly around “forever chemicals,” we may face escalating compliance costs, legal exposure, and reputational damage from contamination claims.

Product quality issues or contamination could result in liability and damage customer relationships.

We must ensure the safety and quality of our engineered soil and compost products, which are subject to standards related to maturity, nutrient content, pathogens, metals, and physical contaminants. Failure to detect or prevent contamination—such as persistent herbicides, pathogens, or foreign objects—could result in crop damage, product recalls, liability claims, or a loss of customer trust. A significant quality incident could also lead to reputational harm and reduced demand for our products.

Fluctuations in market demand and economic conditions could negatively impact revenue.

Demand for compost and engineered soils can vary based on broader economic cycles, and customer budgets in sectors such as landscaping, agriculture, and construction. Economic downturns or slowdowns in real estate and infrastructure investment may lead to decreased product sales. Additionally, market shifts or temporary demand spikes—such as those seen during the COVID-19 pandemic—pose forecasting challenges that can result in overcapacity or missed opportunities.

We face intense competition and pressure from alternative products.

The market for upcycling, composting, and related logistics technologies is highly competitive and rapidly evolving, driven by increasing regulatory pressure, expanding sustainability mandates, and a growing demand for environmentally conscious supply chain solutions. Resource Group operates in a landscape populated by both established waste management firms and emerging clean technology companies offering composting, upcycling, and organic waste processing systems, many of whom have greater financial resources than we do.

The composting and engineered soils industry is fragmented and competitive, with numerous private companies, municipalities, and vertically integrated waste management firms offering similar products. We also face competition from synthetic fertilizers, topsoil, and emerging soil technologies. Price sensitivity in the market and the commoditized nature of many products limit our pricing flexibility and may require significant investments in innovation and customer service to maintain or grow market share.

Operational hazards at processing sites pose safety and business continuity risks.

Our facilities involve risks associated with high-temperature microbial decomposition, heavy machinery, and exposure to bioaerosols. Operational hazards such as fires, equipment failure, and occupational injuries can disrupt production, endanger employees, and expose us to regulatory enforcement or lawsuits. Proper training, maintenance, and safety protocols are essential to prevent incidents that could affect worker safety or lead to costly shutdowns or remediation. We currently utilize a single building and mill for our compost business. If anything were to limit or prevent our ability to fully utilize such building and equipment, resulting delays could harm our relationship with customers if such delays caused us to miss our scheduled shipment deadlines. We may not be able to identify or secure alternative processing facilities or equipment on a timely basis, or at all, which could prevent us from being able to continue to meet all of our demands on a timely basis. If we fail to meet our manufacturing requirements, our business would be harmed until we are able to secure alternative sources, if any, on commercially reasonable terms.

Odor, noise, and other nuisance issues may lead to community opposition or litigation.

Composting operations generate odors and, to a lesser extent, dust, noise, and truck traffic, which can affect neighboring communities. Despite efforts to manage these impacts, we may face nuisance complaints, lawsuits, or regulatory action if our operations are perceived as detrimental to public welfare. Community resistance to composting sites can also hinder our ability to expand or renew permits, particularly in urban or suburban locations.

Dependence on government policies and incentives could affect long-term viability.

Our industry benefits from supportive government policies, including landfill bans, organics diversion mandates, and infrastructure grants. Changes in these policies—such as reduced funding, weak enforcement, or political opposition—could limit feedstock availability, restrict product markets, or curtail expansion opportunities. The success of our operations partly depends on the continuation and effective implementation of these public programs.

Logistical challenges could disrupt supply chains and limit our market reach.

The collection, transport, and distribution of organic materials and finished compost products require efficient logistics coordination. Challenges such as rising fuel costs, trucking shortages, weather disruptions, and regulatory constraints on vehicle access can hinder material flows, increase costs, or delay delivery. Because many of our products are bulky and have a limited shelf life, our profitability depends on cost-effective and reliable transportation and logistics systems.

Our implementation of the Microtec UTM 1200 Turbo Mill system to expand our organics processing capabilities is subject to significant execution, financing, and operational risks.

We are in the process of implementing the Microtec UTM 1200 Turbo Mill system at our Myakka City facility as a Phase 1 enhancement to our existing organics processing operations. The implementation is subject to a number of risks, including: the availability of sufficient capital to fund the installation and commissioning of the equipment; delays in equipment delivery, site preparation, or regulatory approval; the risk that the system does not perform at projected throughput or quality specifications upon installation; the risk that integration with our existing processing operations is more complex or costly than anticipated; and the risk that market conditions for engineered soil or mulch products do not support the incremental output the system is designed to generate. We have no prior operating history with the UTM 1200 system and cannot provide assurance that it will generate the anticipated processing improvements or cost savings. If the implementation is delayed, underperforms, or requires additional capital beyond our current resources, our financial condition, results of operations, and business prospects could be materially and adversely affected.

We may not realize the anticipated strategic growth plans and anticipated benefits of the acquisition of Resource Group.

While we anticipate that operations of our compost business will provide certain strategic benefits to our Company that would not otherwise be realized, there is no assurance that there will be any financial or strategic advantages. Specifically, we believe the acquisition will provide certain strategic benefit, such as market entry into the engineered soils sector, expansion of our customer base, and operational synergies. However, the acquisition of Resource Group and entry into these markets may not have the value and commercial potential that we envision and we may not realize any return on investment, which may cause us to lose momentum in our broader growth strategy. The market price of our Common Stock may decline as a result of the acquisition if we do not achieve the perceived benefits of the acquisition as rapidly or to the extent anticipated by us or investors, financial analysts, or industry analysts. There can be no assurance that these anticipated benefits of the acquisition will materialize or that if they materialize will result in increased stockholder value or revenue stream to our company. Failure to successfully integrate the operations of Resource Group with our own could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and future growth prospects. 

Our stockholders experienced dilution as a result of the acquisition of Resource Group, and they may not realize a benefit from the acquisition commensurate with the ownership dilution they experienced in connection therewith.

In connection with our acquisition of Resource Group, we paid to the members of Resource Group consideration including the RG Closing Shares and the RG Convertible Note, which is convertible into shares of restricted Common Stock. The issuance of the Closing Shares had, and the issuance of shares upon conversion of the RG Convertible Note will have, the effect of diluting the ownership interests of our existing stockholders. If we are unable to realize the full strategic and financial benefits currently anticipated from the acquisition of Resource Group, our stockholders will may experience substantial dilution of their ownership interests in our company without receiving any commensurate benefit, or only receiving part of the commensurate benefit to the extent we are able to realize only part of the strategic and financial benefits currently anticipated from the acquisition.

In order to realize the intended benefits of our acquisition of Resource Group, we continue to devote significant resources to Resource Group’s business, and we may be unable to successfully integrate the business, and we may be unable to successfully integrate the businesses with our current management and structure.

Our failure to successfully complete the integration of Resource Group could have an adverse effect on our prospects, business activities, cash flow, financial condition, results of operations and stock price. Integration challenges may include the following:

Risks Related To Our Logistics Business

Interest rates may affect our profit. 

Our vehicles are often financed by lenders. If interest rates meaningfully rise, we may not be able to pass off the increase to our customers by increasing prices we charge and therefore our profit and cash flow may suffer.

We may be dependent on a limited number of customers, and the loss of any significant customer could adversely affect our revenues and results of operations.

Our biomass recycling and logistics businesses currently serve a limited set of customers, including municipal entities, construction contractors, and landscaping companies operating primarily in Florida. Although we have not yet experienced significant customer attrition since completing our acquisition of Resource Group in June 2025, we cannot guarantee that our customer relationships will continue or that existing customers will continue to engage us on terms acceptable to us. The loss of one or more significant customers, or a reduction in the volume of services they require, could have a material adverse effect on our revenues, operating results, and cash flows. We have not yet established the diversified customer base necessary to reduce our dependence on any individual customer or customer segment.

Decreased customer demand for transportation services due to adverse economic conditions, competition or other factors have and could in the future adversely impact our business and operating results.

The transportation industry is highly cyclical and highly susceptible to trends in economic activity. Weakness or uncertainty in economic conditions in the U.S could adversely impact our business and operating results. Our business relies on the strength of our customers’ businesses and the level of confidence our customers have about current and future economic conditions and trends. A portion of our vehicles transport goods commercially for third parties in the general merchandise and consumer products goods industries, so the demand for our products and services is tied directly to the production and sale of goods by our customers, and more generally, the health of the U.S. economy and overall levels of competition in the transportation and logistics industry. As such, our volumes are largely dependent on consumer spending and retail sales and our results may be more susceptible to trends in unemployment and retail sales than carriers that do not have this concentration.  Because of this, our business may begin to slow before market slowdowns, at the point of customer uncertainty, and may recover later than market recoveries, as our customers may continue to feel uncertain about future market conditions. If uncertainty and lack of customer confidence around macroeconomic and transportation industry conditions increase, our future growth prospects, business and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. 

Economic and capital markets conditions may adversely affect our customers and their ability to remain solvent. Our customers’ financial difficulties can negatively impact our business and operating results and financial condition. Generally, we do not have contractual relationships with our customers that guarantee any minimum volumes, and our customer relationships may not continue as presently in effect. 

In addition, any commercial driver shortages may negatively impact our business as our customers may be unable to secure adequate transportation capacity for their goods.

We face risks related to vehicle costs and availability. 

Vehicle costs typically represent our single largest logistic expense and can vary from year to year based on the prices that we are able to purchase new vehicles and dispose of our used vehicles. The costs of our vehicles may be adversely impacted by the relative strength of the new and used vehicle markets, particularly the market for one- to two-year old used vehicles, or potentially by the insolvency or bankruptcy of a dealer from whom we purchase vehicles or a truck manufacturer from whom the dealers purchase vehicles. A reduction in residual values for vehicles could cause us to sustain a substantial loss on the ultimate sale of such vehicles or require us to depreciate those vehicles at a more accelerated rate than previously anticipated while we own them.

In addition, many of our vehicles are purchased pursuant to loans that are collateralized by the vehicles. If we are unable to meet our collateral requirements under such facilities, the outstanding principal amount due may be required to be repaid earlier than anticipated. If that were to occur, the holders of our loans may have the ability to foreclose on the collateralized vehicles.

We have a limited number of dealers from whom we source our vehicles and the limited dealers source their vehicles from a limited number of manufacturers.  

While we source our vehicle purchases from a wide range of auto manufacturers, we are exposed to risk to the extent that any auto manufacturer significantly curtails production, increases the cost of vehicles or declines to sell vehicles to us on terms or at prices consistent with past practice. Should any of these risks occur, we may be unable to obtain a sufficient number of vehicles to operate our business without significantly increasing our fleet costs or reducing our volumes.

We obtain our trucks from a limited number of dealers.

We purchase and/or lease our vehicles from a limited number of dealers that purchase the vehicles directly from a limited number of manufacturers. Our vehicles can be negatively affected by issues that our dealers or the manufacturers may face within their own supply chain. Also, it is possible that our suppliers may face financial difficulties or organizational changes which could negatively impact their ability to accept future orders or fulfill existing orders. The cost of acquiring new trucks could increase materially and negatively affect our ability to rotate new equipment into the fleet. Although we believe that we could contract with alternative manufacturers for our trucks, we cannot guarantee or predict how long that would take. In addition, termination of our existing relationship with these suppliers could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations for an indefinite period of time.

Difficulty in obtaining materials, equipment, goods and services from suppliers could adversely affect our business.

We and our owner-operators are dependent upon suppliers for trucks, equipment parts, and related materials. Supply disruptions or cost increases from truck and equipment manufacturers could adversely affect our ability to maintain our fleet and fulfill logistics commitments. If we and our owner-operators fail to maintain favorable relationships with such suppliers, or if such suppliers are unable to provide the products and materials we or our owner-operators need or undergo financial hardship, we and our owner-operators could experience difficulty in obtaining needed goods and services because of production interruptions, limited material availability or other reasons, or we and our owner-operators may not be able to obtain favorable pricing or other terms. As a result, our business and operations could be adversely affected.

We face risks related to safety recalls affecting our vehicles.

Our vehicles may be subject to safety recalls by their manufacturers, which could have an adverse impact on our business when we remove recalled vehicles from our operating fleet. We cannot control nor predict the number of vehicles that will be subject to manufacturer recalls in the future. Recalls often require us to retrieve vehicles from customers and/or hold vehicles until we can arrange for the repairs described in the recalls to be completed. As such, recalls can increase our costs, negatively impact our revenues and/or reduce our vehicle utilization. If a large number of vehicles were to be the subject of one or more recalls, or if needed replacement parts were not in adequate supply, we may be unable to utilize recalled vehicles for a significant period of time. We could also face liability claims related to vehicles subject to a safety recall. Depending on the nature and severity of the recall, it could create customer service problems, reduce the residual value of the vehicles involved, harm our general reputation and/or have an adverse impact on our financial condition or results of operations. 

We face risks related to liability and insurance. 

Our operations expose us to several forms of liability, including claims for bodily injury, death, and property damage related to the operation of our vehicles and equipment, as well as workers’ compensation and other employment-related claims by our employees. We may become exposed to uninsured liability at levels in excess of our historical levels. In addition, liabilities related to existing or future claims may exceed the level of our reserves and/or our insurance, which could adversely impact our financial condition and results of operations. Should we be subject to an adverse ruling, or experience other significant liability for which we did not plan and were not adequately insured, our results of operations, financial position or cash flows could be negatively impacted. Furthermore, the cost of vehicle insurance has significantly increased recently, and insurance with unaffiliated insurers may not continue to be available to us on economically reasonable terms or at all. If interest rates continue to rise, we may not be able to pass of such increase to our customers by increasing prices, which in turn would negatively impact our operating results and financial condition. Additionally, increases in insurance costs may result in an increase in the prices charged by the third-party owner-operators that we engage to perform certain of our logistic services, which could further negatively impact our operating results and financial condition.

Our industry is highly competitive, which subjects us to competitive pressures pertaining to pricing, capacity and service. 

The logistics business is highly competitive for customers. Competition affects our ability to succeed in the markets we currently serve and new markets that we may enter in the future. We compete with several larger more established companies that have greater financial, marketing and other resources than we do and provide services on a national and even international basis. Some of our competitors may have greater access to equipment, a larger fleet, a wider range of services, a wider geographic reach, brand recognition, preferential dedicated customer contracts, greater capital resources or other competitive advantages.  Competition in our industry is based primarily on brand name, price and services performance.  

Numerous competitive factors could impair our ability to maintain or improve our profitability. These factors include the following:

We rely on third-party owner-operators to complete some of our logistics services, which could result in a labor shortage, and we currently expect to continue to rely on third parties to services us and certain of our customers.

We rely on, and currently expect to continue to rely on, third-party owner-operators to perform certain of our logistics services and to transport certain of our compost materials. To the extent that the current third-party owner-operators we work with or those that we engage in the future are unable to meet our requirements in a timely and cost-effective manner, we may not be able to source alternative contractors to timely perform our services. Additionally, such third-party owner-operators are not on fixed contracts, and may elect to cease performance of services to us and our customers at any time and for any reason. Should such third-party owner-operators elect not to continue to provide services to us, we may experience delays in our ability to provide our services and meet contractual deadlines. Any such impacts or delays could adversely affect our sales, cash flows and financial condition and our business may be adversely affected.

If we fail to recruit or retain capable drivers or other qualified employees or contractors, we may be unable to maintain our service quality.

We depend on the skills and continued service of capable drivers and other qualified employees and contractors for the provision of certain of our logistics and transportation services. We must be able to attract, develop and retain skillful and qualified workforce. If we are unable to hire, properly train or retain qualified employees or contractors, we could experience decreased service quality, higher labor costs, reduced revenues, regulatory noncompliance, customer losses and diminution of our company culture. Our ability to control labor costs has in the past been, and is expected to continue to be, subject to numerous factors, including labor-related contractual obligations, turnover, training costs, regulatory changes, market pressures, inflation, unemployment levels and healthcare and other benefit costs. Our inability to retain experienced and motivated employees and contractors may materially adversely affect us.

Fuel costs, transportation constraints, and material price volatility may reduce our operating margins.

Our bulk materials logistics and hauling operations rely on a fleet of trucks and external transportation vendors. We require significant quantities of fuel for our vehicles and are exposed to the risks associated with variations in the market price for petroleum products, including gasoline. Rising fuel prices, driver shortages, or new regulatory mandates such as emissions limits or hours-of-service rules can increase logistics costs. Fuel prices have recently increased significantly as a result of the ongoing conflict in the Middle East, and recent military operations by the U.S. and Israel in Iran could lead to even more significant spikes in fuel prices, which has and may continue to negatively impact our business. Moreover, we could experience a disruption in fuel supplies as a result of weather-related events, natural disasters, political disruptions or wars involving oil-producing countries, economic sanctions imposed against oil-producing countries or specific industry participants, changes in governmental policy concerning fuel production, transportation, taxes, or marketing, changes in refining capacity, environmental concerns, cyberattacks, public and investor sentiment, or other factors beyond our control, which could have a material adverse effect on us. Additionally, inflationary pressures or supply chain disruptions may impact the availability and cost of key materials such as aggregate, compost, or structural fill, adversely affecting profitability.

Damage to our reputation or brands may negatively impact our business.

Our reputation and brand are integral to the success of our business. Maintenance of our reputation and brands depends on many factors, including the quality of our products and services and the trust we maintain with our customers. Negative claims or publicity regarding us or our operations, offerings or practices, among many other things, may damage our brands or reputation, even if such claims are untrue. Damage to our reputation or brands could adversely impact our revenue and profitability.

Any failure to adapt to changes in the logistics and transportation industry, provide a high-quality experience for our customers, adopt new technologies, capitalize on cost saving initiatives or meet customer needs could substantially harm our reputation and competitiveness and could adversely impact our financial condition or results of operations.

We operate in a highly regulated industry and changes in existing regulations or violations of existing or future regulations could have a material adverse effect on our operations and profitability.

Our logistics business is subject to regulation by various federal and state entities. As such, the U.S. Department of Transportation and various state and federal agencies exercise broad powers over our motor carrier operations and safety procedures. We are required to obtain vehicle registrations from the U.S. Department of Transportation for each of our vehicles, all of which are subject to annual inspections. The failure to comply with these laws and regulations may adversely affect our ability operate our vehicles. Compliance with changing regulations could substantially increase our costs. In addition, the Federal government may institute some regulation that limits carbon emissions by setting a maximum amount of carbon individual vehicles can emit without penalty, thus requiring us to replace noncompliant vehicles or to modify non-compliant vehicles. This would likely affect everyone who uses fossil fuels and would disproportionately affect users in the highway transportation industries. While there are too many variables at this time to assess the impact of the various proposed federal and state regulations that could affect carbon emissions, many experts believe these proposed rules could significantly affect the way companies operate in their businesses.

The seasonal pattern generally experienced in the trucking industry may affect our periodic results during traditionally slower shipping periods and winter months.

In the trucking industry, revenue generally follows a seasonal pattern that may affect our operating results. Our operations may experience seasonal variability driven by construction activity, weather patterns, and the demand cycles of our municipal and commercial customers. After the December holiday season and during the remaining winter months, our freight volumes are typically lower because some customers reduce shipment levels. Our operating expenses have historically been higher in the winter months because of cold temperatures and other adverse winter weather conditions which can result in increased cold weather-related maintenance costs and increased insurance and claims costs. Revenue can also be affected by adverse weather conditions, holidays and the number of business days during a given period because revenue is directly related to the available working days of shippers. From time to time, we may also suffer short-term impacts from severe weather and similar events, such as, hurricanes, blizzards, ice storms, floods, fires, and explosions that could harm our results of operations or make our results of operations more volatile.

We face risks related to our reliance on communications networks and centralized information systems.

We rely heavily on the satisfactory performance and availability of our information systems, websites and network infrastructure to attract and retain customers, process service transactions, manage our fleet of vehicles, account for our activities and otherwise conduct our business. Our information systems are largely Internet-based, including our point-of-sale reservation system, payment processing and telephone systems. While our reliance on this technology lowers our cost of providing service and expands our abilities to better serve customers, it exposes us to various risks including natural and man-made disasters, terrorist attacks and cyber-attacks. We have put into place extensive security protocols, backup systems and alternative procedures to mitigate these risks. However, disruptions or breaches, detected or undetected by us, for any period of time in any portion of these systems could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition and inflict reputational damage. Such a failure or interruption, could cause a loss of reservations, interfere with our fleet management, slow rental and sales processes, create negative publicity that damages our reputation or otherwise adversely impacts our ability to manage our business effectively. We may experience system interruptions or disruptions for a variety of reasons, including from network failures, power outages, cyber-attacks, employee errors, software errors, an unusually high volume of visitors attempting to access our systems, or other events such as fire, explosions, earthquakes, storms, floods, epidemics, strikes, acts of war, civil unrest or terrorist acts. Because we are dependent in part on independent third parties for the implementation and maintenance of certain aspects of our systems and because some of the causes of system interruptions may be outside of our control, we may not be able to remedy such interruptions in a timely manner, or at all. 

Risks Related To Our Real Estate Business

Our property portfolio has a high concentration of properties located in certain states.

To date, our properties are located in Georgia, Texas and Oklahoma. Certain of our properties are located in areas that may experience catastrophic weather and other natural events from time to time, including hurricanes or other severe weather, flooding fires, snow or ice storms, windstorms or earthquakes. These adverse weather and natural events could cause substantial damages or losses to our properties which could exceed our insurance coverage. In the event of a loss in excess of insured limits, we could lose our capital invested in the affected property, as well as anticipated future revenue from that property. We could also continue to be obligated to repay any mortgage indebtedness or other obligations related to the property. Any such loss could materially and adversely affect our business and our financial condition and results of operations.

To the extent that significant changes in the climate occur, we may experience extreme weather and changes in precipitation and temperature and rising sea levels, all of which may result in physical damage to or a decrease in demand for properties located in these areas or affected by these conditions. Should the impact of climate change be material in nature, including destruction of our properties, or occur for lengthy periods of time, our financial condition or results of operations may be adversely affected. In addition, changes in federal and state legislation and regulation on climate change could result in increased capital expenditures to improve the energy efficiency of our existing properties or to protect them from the consequence of climate change.

Our insurance coverage on our properties may be inadequate to cover any losses we may incur and our insurance costs may increase.

We maintain insurance on our properties. However, there are certain types of losses, generally of a catastrophic nature, such as floods or acts of war or terrorism that may be uninsurable or not economical to insure. Further, insurance companies often increase premiums, require higher deductibles, reduce limits, restrict coverage, and refuse to insure certain types of risks, which may result in increased costs or adversely affect our business. We use our discretion when determining amounts, coverage limits and deductibles, for insurance, based on retaining an acceptable level of risk at a reasonable cost. This may result in insurance coverage that, in the event of a substantial loss, would not be sufficient to pay the full current market value or current replacement cost of our lost investment. In addition, we may become liable for injuries and accidents at our properties that are underinsured. A significant uninsured loss or increase in insurance costs could materially and adversely affect our business, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations.

Our operating results may be negatively affected by potential development and construction delays and resultant increased costs and risks.

We hold certain legacy real estate properties that are subject to regulatory and market uncertainties, environmental concerns of governmental entities or community groups and our contractor’s or partner’s ability to build in conformity with plans, specifications, budgeted costs, and timetables. Performance also may be affected or delayed by conditions beyond our control. We may incur additional risks when we make periodic progress payments or other advances to builders before they complete construction. If a builder or development partner fails to perform, we may resort to legal action to rescind the purchase or the construction contract or to compel performance, but there can be no assurance any legal action would be successful. These and other factors can result in increased costs of a project or loss of our investment. In addition, we will be subject to normal lease-up risks relating to newly constructed projects. We also must rely on rental income and expense projections and estimates of the fair market value of property upon completion of construction when agreeing upon a price at the time we acquire the property. If our projections are inaccurate, we may pay too much for a property, and our return on our investment could suffer.

Discovery of previously undetected environmentally hazardous conditions may adversely affect our business.

We are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations that (a) regulate certain activities and operations that may have environmental or health and safety effects, such as the management, generation, release or disposal of regulated materials, substances or wastes, (b) impose liability for the costs of cleaning up, and damages to natural resources from, past spills, waste disposals on and off-site, or other releases of hazardous materials or regulated substances, and (c) regulate workplace safety. Compliance with these laws and regulations could increase our operational costs. Violation of these laws may subject us to significant fines, penalties or disposal costs, which could negatively impact our results of operations, financial position and cash flows. Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, a current or previous owner or operator of currently or formerly owned, leased or operated real property may be liable for the cost of removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances on, under or in such property. The costs of removal or remediation could be substantial. Such laws often impose liability whether or not the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. Accordingly, we may incur significant costs to defend against claims of liability, to comply with environmental regulatory requirements, to remediate any contaminated property, or to pay personal injury claims.

Moreover, environmental laws also may impose liens on property or other restrictions on the manner in which property may be used or businesses may be operated, and these restrictions may require substantial expenditures or prevent us or our lessees from operating such properties. Compliance with new or more stringent laws or regulations or stricter interpretation of existing laws may require us to incur material expenditures. Future laws, ordinances or regulations or the discovery of currently unknown conditions or non-compliances may impose material liability under environmental laws.

The business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition of our real estate segment are affected by the performance of the real estate industry.

The U.S. real estate industry is highly cyclical and is affected by global, national and local economic conditions, general employment and income levels, availability of financing, interest rates, and consumer confidence and spending. Other factors impacting real estate businesses include over-building, changes in traffic patterns, changes in demographic conditions, changes in tenant and buyer preferences and changes in government requirements, including tax law changes. These factors are outside of our control and may have a material adverse effect on our business, profits and the timing and amounts of our cash flows.

Adverse changes in general and local economic conditions may reduce the value of or demand for our legacy real estate holdings, which could have a material adverse effect on our ability to monetize these assets

Our business can be substantially affected by adverse changes in general economic or business conditions that are outside of our control, including changes in short-term and long-term interest rates; employment levels and job and personal income growth; housing demand from population growth, household formation and other demographic changes, among other factors; availability and pricing of mortgage financing for homebuyers; consumer confidence generally and the confidence of potential homebuyers in particular; consumer spending; financial system and credit market stability; private party and government mortgage loan programs (including changes in FHA, USDA, VA, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac conforming mortgage loan limits, credit risk/mortgage loan insurance premiums and/or other fees, down payment requirements and underwriting standards), and federal and state regulation, oversight and legal action regarding lending, appraisal, foreclosure and short sale practices; federal and state personal income tax rates and provisions, including provisions for the deduction of mortgage loan interest payments, real estate taxes and other expenses; supply of and prices for available new or resale multifamily units; interest of financial institutions or other businesses in purchases; and real estate taxes. Adverse changes in these conditions may affect our business nationally or may be more prevalent or concentrated in particular submarkets in which we operate. Inclement weather, natural disasters (such as earthquakes, hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, prolonged periods of precipitation, droughts, and fires), other calamities and other environmental conditions can delay the delivery of our units and/or increase our costs. Civil unrest or acts of terrorism can also have a negative effect on our business. If the housing industry experiences a significant or sustained downturn, it would materially adversely affect our business and results of operations in future years. The potential difficulties described above can cause demand and prices for our units to fall or cause us to take longer and incur more costs to develop the land and build our units. We may not be able to recover these increased costs by raising prices because of market conditions.

Fluctuations in real estate values may require us to write-down the book value of our real estate assets.

Real estate values are subject to significant variability and fluctuations. As a result, we may be required to write down the book value of our legacy real estate assets in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”), and some of those write-downs could be material. Any material write-downs of assets could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, liquidity, financial condition, and results of operations. In addition, valuations of real estate properties do not necessarily represent the price at which a willing buyer would purchase such property; therefore, there can be no assurance that we would realize the values underlying estimated valuations of our properties if we were to sell such properties.

We may be required to take write-downs or write-offs, restructuring, and impairment or other charges that could have a significant negative effect on our financial condition, results of operations, and our stock price, which could cause you to lose some or all of your investment.

Factors outside of our business and outside of our control may arise. As a result of these factors, we may be forced to write down or write off assets, restructure operations, or incur impairment or other charges that could result in losses. Further, unexpected risks may arise, and previously known risks may materialize in a manner not consistent with our risk analysis. Even though these charges may be non-cash items and not have an immediate impact on our liquidity, the fact that we report charges of this nature could contribute to negative market perceptions about us or our securities. Accordingly, our securities could suffer a reduction in value.

Inflation could adversely affect our business and financial results.

Inflation could adversely affect our business and financial results by increasing the costs of raw materials, fuel, labor, and equipment needed to operate our business. If inflationary pressures reduce customer spending, relative to demand, we may be unable to offset any such increases in costs with corresponding higher sales prices for our units or buildings. Inflation may also accompany higher interest rates, which could adversely impact potential customers’ ability to obtain financing on favorable terms, thereby further decreasing demand. If we are unable to raise the prices of our units or buildings to offset the increasing costs of our operations, our margins could decrease. Furthermore, if we need to lower the price of our units to meet demand, the value of our land inventory may decrease. Inflation may also raise our costs of capital and decrease our purchasing power, making it more difficult to maintain sufficient funds to operate our business.

We could be impacted by our investments through joint ventures, which involve risks not present in investments in which we are the sole owner.

We have in the past funded real estate projects through the use of joint ventures and retain residual interests in certain joint venture entities. Joint ventures involve risks including, but not limited to, the possibility that the other joint venture partners may possess the ability to take or force action contrary to our interests or withhold consent contrary to our requests, have business goals which are or become inconsistent with ours, or default on their financial obligations to the joint venture, which may require us to fulfill the joint venture’s financial obligations as a legal or practical matter. We and our joint venture partners may each have the right to initiate a buy-sell arrangement, which could cause us to sell our interest, or acquire a joint venture partner’s interest, at a time when we otherwise would not have entered into such a transaction. In addition, a sale or transfer by us to a third party of our interests in the joint venture may be subject to consent rights or rights of first refusal in favor of our partners which would restrict our ability to dispose of our interest in the joint venture. Each joint venture agreement is individually negotiated, and our ability to operate, finance, or dispose of a joint venture project in our sole discretion is limited to varying degrees depending on the terms of the applicable joint venture agreement.

Risks associated with our legacy real estate holdings could adversely affect our business or financial results

Risks inherent in holding legacy real estate assets are substantial. The value of our remaining real estate interests may decline due to changes in market conditions, regulatory constraints, or the inability to transact on favorable terms. As a result, we may buy and develop land parcels on which housing units cannot be profitably built and sold. In certain circumstances, a grant of entitlements or development agreement with respect to a particular parcel of land may include restrictions on the transfer of such entitlements to a buyer of such land, which could negatively impact the price of such entitled land by restricting our ability to sell it for its full entitled value. In addition, inventory carrying costs can be significant and can result in reduced margins or losses in a poorly performing community or market. The time and investment required for development may adversely impact our business. In the event of significant changes in economic or market conditions, we may have to sell units or buildings at significantly lower margins or at a loss, if we are able to sell them at all. Additionally, deteriorating market conditions could cause us to record significant inventory impairment charges. The recording of a significant inventory impairment could negatively affect our reported earnings per share and negatively impact the market perception of our business.

We may not be able to sell our real property assets when we desire.

Investments in real property are relatively illiquid compared to other investments. Accordingly, we may not be able to sell real property assets when we desire or at prices acceptable to us. This could substantially reduce the funds available for satisfying our obligations, including any debt obligations.

Access to financing sources may not be available on favorable terms, or at all, which could adversely affect our ability to maximize our returns.

Our access to third-party sources of financing will depend, in part, on:

The global credit and equity markets and the overall economy can be extremely volatile, which could have a number of adverse effects on our operations and capital requirements. For the past decade, the domestic financial markets have experienced a high degree of volatility, uncertainty and, during certain periods, tightening of liquidity in both the high yield debt and equity capital markets, resulting in certain periods where new capital has been both more difficult and more expensive to access. If we are unable to access the credit markets, we could be required to defer or eliminate important business strategies and growth opportunities in the future. In addition, if there is volatility and weakness in the capital and credit markets, potential lenders may be unwilling or unable to provide us with financing that is attractive to us or may increase collateral requirements or may charge us prohibitively high fees in order to obtain financing. Consequently, our ability to access the credit market in order to attract financing on reasonable terms may be adversely affected. Investment returns on our assets and our ability to make acquisitions could be adversely affected by our inability to secure additional financing on reasonable terms, if at all. Depending on market conditions at the relevant time, we may have to rely more heavily on additional equity financings or on less efficient forms of debt financing that require a larger portion of our cash flow from operations, thereby reducing funds available for our operations, future business opportunities and other purposes. We may not have access to such equity or debt capital on favorable terms at the desired times, or at all.

In addition, under a securities purchase agreement we entered into on October 16, 2025, with institutional investors in connection with the sale of 360,000 shares of our Series B Non-Voting Convertible Preferred Stock, we are subject to certain restrictive covenants that may make it difficult for us to procure additional financing.

General Business Risk Factors

New lines of business or new products and services may subject us to additional risks.

From time to time, we may implement or acquire new lines of business, such as we have in the past. There are risks and uncertainties associated with these efforts, particularly in instances where the markets are not fully developed or are evolving. In developing and marketing new lines of business and new products and services, we may invest significant time and resources. In addition, new business ventures may require different strategic management competencies and risk considerations compared to those of our existing management team. External factors, such as regulatory compliance obligations, competitive alternatives, and shifting market preferences, may also impact the successful implementation of a new line of business or a new product or service. Failure to successfully manage these risks in the development and implementation of new lines of business or new products or services could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

Our acquisition of Resource Group may not result in the strategic benefits that we anticipated.

Our acquisition of Resource Group was intended to provide certain strategic benefits that we believe would enable us to bring value to our stockholders. The market price of our Common Stock may not reflect the value of these benefits. The market price of our Common Stock however may decline if we do not achieve the perceived benefits of the acquisitions as rapidly or to the extent anticipated by us or investors, financial analysts, or industry analysts. There can be no assurance that these anticipated benefits of the acquisitions will materialize or that if they materialize will result in increased stockholder value or revenue stream to the combined company.

Legislative, regulatory, accounting or tax rules, and any changes to them or actions brought to enforce them, could adversely affect us.

We are subject to a wide range of legislative, regulatory, accounting and tax rules. The costs and efforts of compliance with these laws, or of defending against actions brought to enforce them, could adversely affect us. In addition, if there are changes to the laws, regulations or administrative decisions and actions that affect us, we may have to incur significant expenses in order to comply, or we may have to restrict or change our operations.

We have invested in real property assets and continue to hold legacy real estate interests, which are subject to laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment and human health and safety. These laws and regulations generally govern wastewater discharges, noise levels, air emissions, the operation and removal of underground and above-ground storage tanks, the use, storage, treatment, transportation and disposal of solid and hazardous materials and the remediation of contamination associated with disposals. Environmental laws and regulations may impose joint and several liabilities on tenants, owners or operators for the costs to investigate and remediate contaminated properties, regardless of fault or whether the acts causing the contamination were legal. This liability could be substantial. In addition, the presence of hazardous substances, or the failure to properly remediate these substances, could adversely affect our ability to sell, rent or pledge an affected property as collateral for future borrowings. We intend to take commercially reasonable steps when we can to protect ourselves from the risks of environmental law liability; however, we may not obtain independent third-party environmental assessments for every property we acquire. In addition, any such assessments that we do obtain may not reveal all environmental liabilities, or whether a prior owner of a property created a material environmental condition not known to us. In addition, there are various local, state and federal fire, health, safety and similar regulations with which we may be required to comply, and that may subject us to liability in the form of fines or damages. In all events, the existing condition of land when we buy it, operations in the vicinity of our properties or activities of unrelated third parties could all affect our properties in ways that lead to costs being imposed on us.

Any material expenditures, fines, damages or forced changes to our business or strategy resulting from any of the above could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

If we were deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”) as a result of our ownership of minority interests in limited liability companies, applicable restrictions could make it impractical for us to continue our business as contemplated and could have an adverse effect on our business.

Under Sections 3(a)(1)(A) and (C) of the 1940 Act, a company generally will be deemed to be an “investment company” for purposes of the 1940 Act if: (i) it is, or holds itself out as being, engaged primarily, or proposes to engage primarily, in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities or (ii) it engages, or proposes to engage, in the business of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading in securities and it owns or proposes to acquire investment securities having a value exceeding 40% of the value of its total assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis. We do not believe that we are an “investment company,” as such term is defined in either of those sections of the 1940 Act as a result of our ownership of minority interests in NB Owners and JDI-Cumberland Inlet LLC and our plans to potentially make other minority investments, and we intend to conduct our operations so that we will not be deemed an investment company.

However, if we were to be deemed an investment company, we would be required to register as an investment company under the 1940 Act and incur significant registration and compliance costs. Additionally, the 1940 Act requires that a number of structural safeguards, such as an independent board of directors and a separate investment adviser whose contract must be approved by a majority of the company’s stockholders, be put in place within such companies. The 1940 Act also imposes significant disclosure and reporting requirements beyond those found in the Securities Act and the Exchange Act. Likewise, the 1940 Act contains its own anti-fraud provisions and private remedies, and it strictly limits investments made by one investment company in another to prevent pyramiding of investment companies, leading to consolidated investment companies acting in the interest of other investment companies rather than in the interest of securities holders. The labeling of the Company as an investment company could make it impractical for us to continue our business as contemplated and could have a material adverse effect on our business and prospects. Compliance with the 1940 Act is prohibitively expensive for small companies, in our estimation, and even if it meant divestiture of assets, we would intend to avoid being classified as an investment company.

Our quarterly results may fluctuate.

We could experience fluctuations in our quarterly operating results due to a number of factors, including variations in the returns on our current and future investments, the interest rates payable on any outstanding debt, the level of our expenses, the levels and timing of the recognition of our realized and unrealized gains and losses, the seasonal nature of travel if the community is a vacation destination, the degree to which we encounter competition in our markets and other business, market and general economic conditions. Consequently, our results of operations for any current or historical period should not be relied upon as being indicative of performance in any future period.

The outbreak of any highly infectious or contagious disease, could materially and adversely impact our performance, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

The COVID-19 pandemic severely impacted global economic activity during 2020 and 2021 and caused significant volatility and negative pressure in financial markets. The outbreak of any highly infectious or contagious diseases could have material and adverse effects on our performance, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows due to, among other factors:

The extent to which a future pandemic impacts our operations will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence.

Changes in general economic conditions, geopolitical conditions, domestic and foreign trade policies, monetary policies and other factors beyond our control may adversely impact our business and operating results.

The uncertain financial markets, disruptions in supply chains, mobility restraints, and changing priorities as well as volatile asset values also affect our business operations and our ability to enter into collaborations and joint ventures. A number of other economic and geopolitical factors both in the U.S. and abroad, could ultimately have material adverse effects on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows, including the following:

We are increasingly dependent on information technology, and our systems and infrastructure face certain risks, including cybersecurity and data leakage risks.

Significant disruptions to our information technology systems or breaches of information security could adversely affect our business. In the ordinary course of business, we collect, store and transmit large amounts of confidential information, and it is critical that we do so in a secure manner to maintain the confidentiality and integrity of such confidential information. The size and complexity of our information technology systems, and those of our third-party vendors with whom we contract, make such systems potentially vulnerable to service interruptions and security breaches from inadvertent or intentional actions by our employees, partners or vendors, from attacks by malicious third parties, or from intentional or accidental physical damage to our systems infrastructure maintained by us or by third parties. Maintaining the secrecy of this confidential, proprietary, or trade secret information is important to our competitive business position. While we have taken steps to protect such information and invested in information technology, there can be no assurance that our efforts will prevent service interruptions or security breaches in our systems or the unauthorized or inadvertent wrongful use or disclosure of confidential information that could adversely affect our business operations or result in the loss, dissemination, or misuse of critical or sensitive information. A breach of our security measures or the accidental loss, inadvertent disclosure, unapproved dissemination, misappropriation or misuse of trade secrets, proprietary information, or other confidential information, whether as a result of theft, hacking, fraud, trickery or other forms of deception, or for any other reason, could enable others to produce competing products, use our proprietary technology or information, or adversely affect our business or financial condition. Further, any such interruption, security breach, loss or disclosure of confidential information, could result in financial, legal, business, and reputational harm to us and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations or cash flow.

Risks Related to Our Common Stock

Our failure to meet the continued listing requirements of the Nasdaq Capital Market could result in a delisting of our Common Stock.

Our shares of Common Stock are currently listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market. If we fail to satisfy the continued listing requirements of Nasdaq, such as the corporate governance requirements, minimum bid price requirement or the minimum stockholder’s equity requirement, The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC may take steps to delist our Common Stock. Any delisting would likely have a negative effect on the price of our Common Stock and would impair stockholders’ ability to sell or purchase their Common Stock when they wish to do so.

On January 26, 2026, we received written notice from the Listing Qualifications Department of Nasdaq notifying us that for the preceding 30 consecutive business days (December 5, 2025 through January 20, 2026), our Common Stock did not maintain a minimum closing bid price of $1.00 per share as required by Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a)(2) (the “Minimum Bid Price Requirement”). The notice had no immediate effect on the listing or trading of our Common Stock, which continues to trade on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “RENX.” In accordance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5810(c)(3)(A), we have a compliance period of 180 calendar days, or until July 27, 2026, to regain compliance. Compliance may be achieved if the closing bid price of our Common Stock is at or above $1.00 for a minimum of ten consecutive business days at any time during the compliance period; however, Nasdaq may require the closing bid price to equal or exceed $1.00 for more than ten consecutive business days before determining compliance. If we do not achieve compliance by July 27, 2026, we may be eligible for an additional compliance period, provided we meet the continued listing requirement for market value of publicly held shares and all other initial listing standards for the Nasdaq Capital Market, with the exception of the Minimum Bid Price Requirement, and notify Nasdaq in writing of our intention to cure the deficiency during the second compliance period. We intend to actively monitor the bid price of our Common Stock and will consider available options to regain compliance, including effecting a reverse stock split, if necessary, to maintain our Nasdaq listing.

In addition, Nasdaq Listing Rule 5810(c)(3)(A)(iii) mandates immediate, accelerated delisting procedures for any company whose closing bid price remains at or below $0.10 for ten consecutive trading days. On March 24,2026 the closing price of our common stock was below $0.10

On March 26, 2026, we effected a 1-for-20 reverse stock split of our then-outstanding Common Stock. Nasdaq Listing Rule 5810(c)(3)(A)(iv) states that any listed company that fails to meet the minimum bid price requirement and has effected a reverse stock split over the prior one-year period, or has effected one or more reverse stock splits over the prior two-year period with a cumulative ratio of 250 shares or more to one, will not be eligible for an automatic 180-day grace compliance period and the Nasdaq Listing Qualifications Department is obligated to immediately issue a delisting determination if it should fail to meet any continued listing requirements. Therefore, if we were to fail to meet any continued listing requirements we would immediately be issued a delisting determination. Further, the Nasdaq rule provides that a company will not be considered to have regained compliance with the minimum bid price requirement if the company takes an action to achieve compliance (such as a reverse split) and that action results in the Company’s security falling below the numeric threshold for another listing requirement.

In order to regain compliance with the Minimum Bid Price Requirement, the closing bid price of our Common Stock must be $1.00 per share or greater for a minimum period of 10 consecutive days (which may be subject to extension by Nasdaq, in their discretion) after completion of the reverse stock split. There can be no assurance that we will be able to regain compliance with the Minimum Bid Price Requirement within the applicable compliance period or at all.

Additionally, Nasdaq has recently proposed a new rule change to (i) adopt Listing Rules 5450(a)(3) and 5550(a)(6) to require issuers listed on the Nasdaq Global and Capital Markets, respectively, to maintain a minimum Market Value of Listed Securities (as defined in Nasdaq Listing Rule 5005(a)(23)) of at least $5 million for a period of 30 consecutive business days, and (ii) amend Rule5810 to suspend trading and immediately delist from Nasdaq securities of issuers that do not satisfy the proposed new requirements, and Rule 5815 to set forth the procedures for requesting a hearing before a Hearings Panel and the scope of the Panel’s discretion (collectively, the “Proposed $5 Million MVLS Rule”). As of the date of the filing of this Annual Report the market value of our listed securities is less than $5 million. If the SEC approves the Proposed $5 Million MVSL Rule, the market value of our listed securities does not meet the $5.0 million requirement as of the date it goes into effect, our securities will be subject to delisting.

If a delisting were to occur, our Common Stock would be subject to rules that impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell our securities. The additional burdens imposed upon broker-dealers by these requirements could discourage broker-dealers from effecting transactions in our Common Stock. This would adversely affect the ability of investors to trade our Common Stock and would adversely affect the value of our Common Stock. Delisting from Nasdaq would cause us to pursue eligibility for trading of our Common Stock on other markets or exchanges, or on an over-the-counter market. In such case, our stockholders’ ability to trade or obtain quotations of the market value of our Common Stock would be severely limited because of lower trading volumes and transaction delays. These factors could contribute to lower prices and larger spreads in the bid and ask prices of these securities. There can be no assurance that our Common Stock, if delisted from the Nasdaq, would be listed on a national securities exchange, a national quotation service or the over-the-counter markets. Delisting from the Nasdaq could also result in negative publicity, adversely affect the market liquidity of our Common Stock, decrease securities analysts’ coverage of us or diminish investor, supplier and employee confidence. In addition, our stock could become a “penny stock,” which would make trading of our Common Stock more difficult.

If Nasdaq delists our securities from trading on its exchange at some future date, we could face significant material adverse consequences, including:

As a result of being a public company, we are obligated to develop and maintain proper and effective internal control over financial reporting in order to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. We may not complete our analysis of our internal control over financial reporting in a timely manner, or these internal controls may not be determined to be effective, which may adversely affect investor confidence in us and, as a result, the value of our Common Stock.

As a result of becoming a public company we are subject to SEC reporting and other regulatory requirements. We have incurred and will continue to incur expenses and diversion of our management’s time in its efforts to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act regarding internal controls over financial reporting. Effective internal controls over financial reporting are necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports and, together with adequate disclosure controls and procedures, are designed to prevent fraud. Any failure to implement required new or improved controls, or difficulties encountered in their implementation could cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations. In addition, any testing by us conducted in connection with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, or the subsequent testing by our independent registered public accounting firm when, and if, required, may reveal deficiencies in our internal controls over financial reporting that are deemed to be material weaknesses or that may require prospective or retrospective changes to our financial statements or identify other areas for further attention or improvement. If we are unable to assert that our internal controls over financial reporting are effective, we could lose investor confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, which would cause the price of our Common Stock to decline, and we may be subject to investigation or sanctions by the SEC. We identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting and determined that our disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective as of June 30, 2024 and continue to be ineffective as of December 31, 2024.

We incur significant costs as a result of operating as a public company and our management devotes substantial time to new compliance initiatives.

As a public company, we have incurred and will continue to incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company. We are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, the other rules and regulations of the SEC, and the rules and regulations of Nasdaq. Compliance with the various reporting and other requirements applicable to public companies requires considerable time and attention of management. For example, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the rules of the SEC and national securities exchanges have imposed various requirements on public companies, including requiring establishment and maintenance of effective disclosure and financial controls. Our management and other personnel are devoting and will continue to need to devote a substantial amount of time to these compliance initiatives. These rules and regulations will continue to increase our legal and financial compliance costs and will make some activities more time-consuming and costly.

We currently do not intend to pay dividends on our Common Stock. Consequently, our stockholders’ ability to achieve a return on their investment will depend on appreciation in the price of our Common Stock.

We do not expect to pay cash dividends on our Common Stock. Any future dividend payments are within the absolute discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on, among other things, our results of operations, working capital requirements, capital expenditure requirements, financial condition, level of indebtedness, contractual restrictions with respect to payment of dividends, business opportunities, anticipated cash needs, provisions of applicable law and other factors that our Board of Directors may deem relevant.

We cannot be certain that an active trading market for our Common Stock will develop or be sustained and our stock price may fluctuate significantly.

We cannot guarantee that we can sustain an active trading market for our Common Stock, nor can we predict the prices at which shares of our Common Stock may trade. Until the market has fully evaluated our business as a standalone entity, the prices at which shares of our Common Stock trade may fluctuate more significantly than might otherwise be typical, even with other market conditions, including general volatility, held constant. The market price of our Common Stock may fluctuate significantly due to a number of factors, some of which may be beyond our control, including:

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our stock price and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for our securities will depend in part on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. If only a limited number of securities or industry analysts commence coverage of our Company, the trading price for our securities would likely be negatively impacted. In the event securities or industry analysts initiate coverage, if one or more of the analysts who covers us downgrades our stock or publishes unfavorable research about our business, our stock price may decline. If one or more of these analysts ceases coverage of our Company or fails to publish reports on us regularly, demand for our securities could decrease, which might cause our stock price and trading volume to decline.

We are an emerging growth company and a smaller reporting company within the meaning of the Securities Act, and we are taking advantage of certain exemptions from disclosure requirements available to emerging growth companies or smaller reporting companies, this could make our securities less attractive to investors and may make it more difficult to compare our performance with other public companies.

We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in Section 2(a) of the Securities Act, as modified by the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”), and are taking advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies, including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved.

Further, Section 102(b)(1) of the JOBS Act exempts emerging growth companies from being required to comply with new or revised financial accounting standards until private companies (that is, those that have not had a registration statement under the Securities Act declared effective or do not have a class of securities registered under the Exchange Act) are required to comply with the new or revised financial accounting standards. The JOBS Act provides that a company can elect to opt out of the extended transition period and comply with the requirements that apply to non-emerging growth companies, but any such an election to opt out is irrevocable. We have elected not to opt out of such extended transition period, which means that when a standard is issued or revised and it has different application dates for public or private companies, we, as an emerging growth company, can adopt the new or revised standard at the time private companies adopt the new or revised standard. This may make comparison of our financial statements with another public company, which is neither an emerging growth company nor an emerging growth company that has opted out of using the extended transition period, difficult or impossible because of the potential differences in accounting standards used.

We will remain an emerging growth company until the earlier of: (1) the last day of the fiscal year (a) following the fifth anniversary of the date of the first sale of our Common Stock pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act, (b) in which we have total annual revenue of at least $1.235 billion, or (c) in which we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer, which generally means the market value of our common equity that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the end of the prior fiscal year’s second fiscal quarter; and (2) the date on which we have issued more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt securities during the prior three-year period. References herein to “emerging growth company” have the meaning associated with it in the JOBS Act.

Additionally, we are a “smaller reporting company” as defined in Item 10(f)(1) of Regulation S-K. Smaller reporting companies may take advantage of certain reduced disclosure obligations, including, among other things, providing only two years of audited financial statements. We will remain a smaller reporting company until the last day of any fiscal year for so long as either (1) the market value of our shares of Common Stock held by non-affiliates did not equal or exceed $250 million as of the prior June 30, or (2) our annual revenues did not equal or exceed $100 million during such completed fiscal year and the market value of our shares of Common Stock held by non-affiliates did not equal or exceed $700 million as of the prior December 31.

Because we are subject to the above listed reduced reporting requirements, investors may not be able to compare us to other companies, this could make our securities less attractive to investors and may make it more difficult to compare our performance with other public companies.

Your percentage ownership in us may be diluted by future issuances.

We currently have 3,046,081 shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion or exercise of existing securities. We also expect that significant additional capital will be needed in the future to continue our planned operations. To the extent these existing securities are converted into or exercised for shares of Common Stock or we raise additional capital by issuing equity securities, our stockholders may experience substantial dilution. Pursuant to the Company’s 2023 Incentive Compensation Plan (our “2023 Plan”), our management may grant equity awards to our employees, directors and consultants. We may sell Common Stock, convertible securities or other equity securities in one or more transactions at prices and in a manner we determine from time to time, any of which may result in material dilution to our existing stockholders. New investors could also be issued securities with rights superior to those of our existing stockholders. Such future equity issuances will have a dilutive effect on the number of shares of our Common Stock outstanding, and therefore on our earnings per share, which could adversely affect the market price of our Common Stock. In addition, if we issue additional convertible debentures and the debentures are converted into shares of Common Stock, stockholders will experience additional dilution.

We may issue shares of preferred stock in the future, which could make it difficult for another company to acquire us or could otherwise adversely affect holders of our Common Stock, which could depress the price of our Common Stock.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation authorizes us to issue one or more series of preferred stock. Our Board of Directors has the authority to determine the preferences, limitations and relative rights of the shares of preferred stock and to fix the number of shares constituting any series and the designation of such series, without any further vote or action by our stockholders. Our preferred stock could be issued with voting, liquidation, dividend and other rights superior to the rights of our Common Stock. The potential issuance of preferred stock may delay or prevent a change in control of us, discouraging bids for our Common Stock at a premium to the market price, and materially adversely affect the market price and the voting and other rights of the holders of our Common Stock.

Provisions in our corporate charter documents and under Delaware law could make an acquisition of our company, which may be beneficial to our stockholders, more difficult and may prevent attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our management.

Provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and our amended and restated bylaws may discourage, delay or prevent a merger, acquisition or other change in control of our company that stockholders may consider favorable, including transactions in which you might otherwise receive a premium for your shares. These provisions could also limit the price that investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our Common Stock, thereby depressing the market price of our Common Stock. In addition, because our Board of Directors is responsible for appointing the members of our management team, these provisions may frustrate or prevent any attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our management by making it more difficult for stockholders to replace members of our Board of Directors. Among other things, these provisions provide:

Moreover, because we are incorporated in Delaware, we are governed by the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which prohibits a person who owns in excess of 15% of our outstanding voting stock from merging or combining with us for a period of three years after the date of the transaction in which the person acquired in excess of 15% of our outstanding voting stock, unless the merger or combination is approved in a prescribed manner.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware will be the exclusive forum for certain types of state actions that may be initiated by our stockholders, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers, or employees.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that, unless we consent to the selection of an alternative forum, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware is the exclusive forum for (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on behalf of us, (ii) any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any of our directors, officers, or other employees to us or our stockholders, (iii) any action arising pursuant to any provision of the DGCL or our amended and restated certificate of incorporation or bylaws (as either may be amended from time to time), or (iv) any action asserting a claim governed by the internal affairs doctrine. The exclusive forum provision does not apply to suits brought to enforce any liability or duty created by the Securities Act or the Exchange Act or any other claim for which the federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction. To the extent that any such claims may be based upon federal law claims, Section 27 of the Exchange Act creates exclusive federal jurisdiction over all suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Exchange Act or the rules and regulations thereunder. Furthermore, Section 22 of the Securities Act creates concurrent jurisdiction for federal and state courts over all suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Securities Act or the rules and regulations thereunder.

These exclusive-forum provisions may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or our directors, employees, control persons, underwriters, or agents, which may discourage lawsuits against us and our directors, employees, control persons, underwriters, or agents. Additionally, a court could determine that the exclusive forum provision is unenforceable, and our stockholders will not be deemed to have waived our compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder. If a court were to find these provisions of our bylaws inapplicable to, or unenforceable in respect of, one or more of the specified types of actions or proceedings, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such matters in other jurisdictions, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, or results of operations.

Even though the Reverse Stock Split increased the market price of our Common Stock, there can be no assurance that our increased stock price will remain at a price that will be sufficient in order to meet any continued requirements and policies of the Nasdaq or that our Common Stock will remain listed on the Nasdaq.

There can be no assurance that the increased stock price resulting from the Reverse Stock Split will be maintained in order to allow us to continue to meet the requirements and policies of the Nasdaq or that our Common Stock will remain listed on the Nasdaq.

The Reverse Stock Split may decrease the liquidity of the shares of our common stock.

The liquidity of the shares of our Common Stock may be affected adversely by the Reverse Stock Split given the reduced number of shares that are outstanding as a result of the Reverse Stock Split, especially if the market price of our Common Stock does not increase as a result of the Reverse Stock Split. In addition, the Reverse Stock Split may have increased the number of stockholders who own odd lots (less than 100 shares) of our Common Stock and such stockholders may experience an increase in the cost of selling their shares of common stock and greater difficulty effecting such sales.

Following the Reverse Stock Split, the resulting market price of our Common Stock may not attract new investors, including institutional investors, and may not satisfy the investing requirements of those investors. Consequently, the trading liquidity of our Common Stock may not improve.

Although we believe that a higher market price of our Common Stock may help generate greater or broader investor interest, there can be no assurance that the Reverse Stock Split will result in a share price that will attract new investors, including institutional investors. In addition, there can be no assurance that the market price of our Common Stock will satisfy the investing requirements of those investors. As a result, the trading liquidity of our Common Stock may not necessarily improve.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

None.

Item 1C. Cybersecurity

Item 2. Properties.

Headquarters and Other Office Space

We utilize rented office space in Miami, Florida for our corporate headquarters which is located at 1111 Brickell Ave., Floor 11, Suite 109, Miami, Florida 33131. We believe that our current office space is adequate for our current needs.

Real Estate Holdings

As part of our strategic shift toward organics processing and logistics, we are in the process of monetizing our legacy real estate holdings. The following summarizes our remaining real estate interests as of the date of this filing. 

Current Status of Legacy Holdings

Lago Vista. On May 10, 2021, LV Peninsula Holding LLC, our wholly owned subsidiary, acquired a 50+ acre site on Lake Travis in Lago Vista, Texas for $3,500,000. On January 6, 2026, LV Peninsula delivered a Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure conveying full title to the Lago Vista property to Austerra Capital Management LLC, conditionally extinguishing $5.0 million of outstanding secured debt. The Company retains a 70% interest in net sale proceeds above $5.0 million and a conditional promissory note of $5.0 million that springs into effect if development is not substantially completed within 24 months. All obligations are cross-collateralized with the Company’s Georgia property.

Norman Berry Village. On May 31, 2021, we acquired a 50% membership interest for $600,000 in a limited liability company, NB Owners LLC, the entity developing an affordable housing project in the Atlanta, Georgia metropolitan area known as Norman Berry Village. As of the date of this filing, the property has been listed for sale. The Company holds a first priority lien of $200,000 and a second priority lien of $599,000 on the NB Owners property. The first lien note matured March 11, 2025 and remains in default. As the holder of both liens, the Company has the right to foreclose on the property.

Cumberland Inlet. On June 24, 2021, we, as a member, entered into an Operating Agreement, with Jacoby Development, Inc. (“JDI”), as manager, for JDI-Cumberland Inlet, LLC (“JDI-Cumberland”), pursuant to which we acquired a 10% non-dilutable equity interest in JDI-Cumberland for $3.0 million. JDI-Cumberland holds a 1,298 acre waterfront parcel in St. Mary’s, Georgia. In May 2025, JDI-Cumberland filed for bankruptcy. As of the date of this filing, we have not received any proceeds from the bankruptcy proceedings.

St Mary’s Industrial Site. On August 18, 2022, we purchased approximately 27 acres of land adjacent to our Cumberland Inlet Project from the Camden County Joint Development Authority (JDA). On January 31, 2024, we entered into an Agreement of Sale with Pigmental, LLC to sell the St. Mary’s Site. See “Part I, Item 1 Business – Recent Developments – St. Mary’s Site.”

McLean Mixed Use Site. During the first quarter of 2022, we acquired 100% ownership of approximately 114 mixed-use acres in Durant, Oklahoma for $868,000. We are currently in discussions with the Durant Industrial Authority regarding a conveyance of the property, in connection with a Lis Pendens filed against the property by the Durant Industrial Authority.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

We are not currently subject to any material legal proceedings. We may, however, in the ordinary course of business face various claims brought by third parties, and we may, from time to time, make claims or take legal actions to assert our rights, including intellectual property rights as well as claims relating to employment matters. Any of these claims could subject us to costly litigation. If this were to happen, the payment of any such awards could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, any such claims, whether or not successful, could damage our reputation and business.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable. 

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Market Information

Our Common Stock is traded on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “RENX.”

Holders

As of the close of business on March 31, 2026, there were approximately 68 holders of record of our Common Stock.

Dividend Policy 

We have never paid any cash dividends on our Common Stock and do not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future. The payment of dividends by us will depend on our future earnings, financial condition and such other business and economic factors as our management may consider relevant.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

Except as set forth below, we did not sell any unregistered securities from January 1, 2025 through December 31, 2025 that were not previously disclosed in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K filed with the SEC.

On November 19, 2025, we issued 150,000 shares of our Common Stock (7,500 as adjusted for the Reserve Split) to Alta Capital LLC (“Alta Capital”) as compensation for consulting services rendered to the Company. The shares were issued in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering. No underwriters were engaged and no underwriting discounts or commissions were paid in connection with such issuance.

On March 28, 2025 and August 27, 2025, we issued 94,000 shares and 40,000 shares (4,700 and 2,000 as adjusted for the Reserve Split), respectively, of our Common Stock to Bridgeline Digital, Inc. (“Bridgeline”) as payment of origination fees in connection with the BCV Loan Agreement. The shares were issued in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act, as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering. No underwriters were engaged and no underwriting discounts or commissions were paid in connection with such issuances.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

For information regarding our equity compensation plans, see “Part III, Item 12, “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.”

Item 6. [Reserved]

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Introduction and Certain Cautionary Statements

The following discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of our operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes and schedules included elsewhere in this Annual Report. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed below. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, intensified competition and operating problems in our operating business projects and their impact on revenues and profit margins or additional factors, and those discussed in the section entitled “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report. In addition, certain information presented below is based on unaudited financial information. 

Overview

We are a Delaware corporation, originally formed in 2021 under the name SGB Development Corp., to engage in real property development using purpose-built, prefabricated modules constructed from both wood and steel. From our inception through 2023, our operations primarily focused on the acquisition, entitlement, and development of residential properties in high-growth markets across the United States. These efforts included the direct acquisition of land, strategic investments in real estate entities, and joint venture partnerships targeting green, single-family and multifamily housing projects.

In 2023 and early 2024, we expanded our strategy by investing in real estate-related artificial intelligence (“AI”) technologies and entering into additional joint ventures in the Southern Texas market aimed at developing sustainable single-family housing. Due to our shift in focus described below, we are no longer pursuing real estate AI related activities. We also announced plans to monetize our real estate holdings by selling properties where third-party appraisals indicated meaningful value appreciation, with proceeds to be reinvested in our current operations.

In June 2025, we completed our acquisition of Resource Group US Holdings LLC (“Resource Group”), which marked a significant strategic shift in our core business. Resource Group, through its subsidiaries, is a vertically integrated, full-service operator in the engineered soils and organic recycling industry. Its operations center on the transformation of targeted organic green waste materials into environmentally friendly soil and mulch products. Through our subsidiary, Zimmer Equipment Inc. (“ZEI”), we provide comprehensive waste logistics and collection services for our own products as well as for products of third parties through ZEI’s owned fleet of high-capacity transportation equipment and third-party contractors engaged by us. ZEI offers year-round collection and disposal services through high-capacity grapple trucks, open-top walking floor trailers, and variable-sized containers serving green waste generators, landscaping companies, golf courses, communities, and municipalities. Resource Group works with ZEI to streamline operations by internalizing certain transportation services, reducing over-the-road mileage, lowering disposal costs, and maximizing efficiency.

We currently operate in three segments: biomass recycling, logistics, and real estate. For the year ended December 31, 2025, we operated in four segments and generated $8,220,449 in revenue, of which approximately $5,935,296 was generated from our logistics business, $2,266,983 was generated from our biomass recycling business, and $18,170 was generated from our technology sector. While our logistics business operated by our subsidiary, ZEI, and our biomass recycling business operated by our subsidiary, Resource Group, are expected to serve as our primary operational focuses going forward, we also currently intend to continue to monetize our legacy real estate assets and joint venture interests.

Recent Financial Developments

July 2025 Equity Offering and Related Agreements

On July 29, 2025, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with two investors (the “July 2025 Purchase Agreement”) pursuant to which we sold 309,691 shares of Common Stock (15,485 as adjusted for the Reserve Split) at $0.9094 per share ($18.19 as adjusted for the Reserve Split), together with pre-funded warrants exercisable for 173,681 shares of common stock (8,684 as adjusted for the Reserve Split) at an exercise price of $0.0001 per share, and five-year warrants to purchase 483,372 shares of Common Stock (24,169 as adjusted for the Reserve Split) at $0.9094 per share ($18.19 as adjusted for the Reserve Split). The warrants were sold at $0.125 per warrant, resulting in aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $560,422. Dawson James Securities, Inc. acted as financial adviser in connection with the offering and received 150,000 restricted shares of common stock and a $20,000 expense reimbursement.

The July 2025 Purchase Agreement provided the investors with a 75-day right of first refusal to participate in any proposed sale of our equity or debt securities, subject to certain exceptions, and prohibited us during that period from entering into any transaction that could interfere with or substitute for a proposed $100 million private-placement financing (the “Treasury Opportunity”) to establish a cryptocurrency treasury reserve. The investors were required to present such an opportunity within three business days of signing, with Dawson James Securities, Inc. serving as exclusive placement agent. The agreement further established specific milestones for presenting, documenting, and consummating a Treasury Opportunity; if those milestones were not met (a “Treasury Opportunity Failure”), the investors’ right of first refusal and related restrictions expired and the consulting agreement that we entered into with Bill Panagiotakopoulos, appointing him as executive consultant at an annual salary of $200,000 to assist in pursuing the Treasury Opportunity also terminated.

In connection with the July 2025 Purchase Agreement, we entered into a forbearance agreement with the assignees of the Arena Debentures, under which the assignees agreed to forbear from exercising rights or remedies relating to certain defaults until sixty-one days after any Treasury Opportunity Failure. We retained a sixty-day period following any such failure to redeem or arrange the purchase of the outstanding Arena Debentures at 115% of principal. Unless and until a Treasury Opportunity Failure occurred, we were restricted from redeeming or arranging the purchase of the Arena Debentures.

The use of proceeds from the July 2025 Purchase Agreement was designated as follows: $100,000 to reimburse deferred expenses incurred by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, $200,000 to pay outstanding legal fees, and the remaining proceeds for working-capital purposes, subject to Mr. Panagiotakopoulos’s reasonable consent.

Additionally, effective July 29, 2025, we entered into a waiver and consent with Arena Business Solutions Global SPC II, LTD, which waived certain rights under existing agreements to permit the offering pursuant to the July 2025 Purchase Agreement. In consideration for the waiver and consent, we issued a five-year pre-funded warrant exercisable for 100,000 shares of common stock (5,000 as adjusted for the Reserve Split) at a nominal exercise price of $0.0001 per share.

October 2025 Private Placement

On October 16, 2025, we entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “October Purchase Agreement”) with institutional investors for the issuance and sale in a private placement transaction of 360,000 shares of a newly designated series of Series B Non-Voting Convertible Preferred Stock convertible at an initial conversion price of $1.36 per share ($27.20 as adjusted for the Reserve Split) into 6,617,647 shares of our common stock (330,882 as adjusted for the Reserve Split) and warrants to purchase up to 6,617,647 shares of our common stock (330,882 as adjusted for the Reserve Split) exercisable at an initial exercise price of $1.36 per share ($27.20 as adjusted for the Reserve Split), subject, among other things, to adjustment, shareholder approval and certain beneficial ownership limitations set by each holder, for a combined purchase price of $25.00 for each share of Series B Preferred Stock and accompanying warrant, which pricing was designed to be in accordance with the “Minimum Price” requirement as defined in the Nasdaq rules. The private placement closed on October 17, 2025. The net proceeds to us were approximately $8.175 million, after deducting placement agent fees and the payment of other offering expenses associated with the offering that were payable by us.

February 2026 Private Placement

On February 12, 2026, we entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “2026 Purchase Agreement”) with certain institutional investors (the “2026 Purchasers”) for the issuance and sale in a private placement transaction (the “2026 Private Placement”) of Senior Convertible Notes (“2026 Notes”) in the aggregate principal amount of $6,042,985.39. The 2026 Notes bear interest at a rate of 12% per annum, mature 13 months from the date of issuance, are payable in ten monthly installments in an amount equal to 110% of (i) 1/10^th of the principal of the 2026 Notes (ii) plus accrued interest, with the first installment due and payable on the earlier of 180 days from the Closing Date or 90 days following the date that the registration statement registering the Common Stock to be issued upon conversion of the 2026 Notes and upon exercise of the 2026 Warrants (as defined below) is declared effective by the SEC and, without taking into account any accrued and unpaid interest, are initially convertible, at the option of the holder, into an aggregate of 21,505,287 shares of the Company’s common stock (1,075,264 as adjusted for the Reserve Split), par value $0.001‌ (the “Common Stock”), at a conversion price of $0.281 per share ($5.62 as adjusted for the Reserve Split) (the “Conversion Price”). In connection with the 2026 Private Placement, we also issued the Purchasers warrants (collectively, the “2026 Warrants”) to purchase an aggregate of 38,751,991 shares of Common Stock (1,937,600 as adjusted for the Reserve Split), of which (i) Warrants to purchase 21,505,287 shares of Common Stock (1,075,264 as adjusted for the Reserve Split) (the “First Warrants”) are exercisable immediately upon issuance and (ii) Warrants to purchase 17,246,704 shares of Common Stock (862,335 as adjusted for the Reserve Split) (the “Second Warrants) cannot be exercised by the Purchasers unless and until Stockholder Approval (as defined below) is obtained. The First Warrants have a term of six years from the date of issuance and will be exercisable at a price of $0.15594 per share of Common Stock ($3.1188 as adjusted for the Reserve Split), and the Second Warrants have a term of six years from the date that Stockholder Approval is obtained and will be exercisable at a price of $0.15594 per share of Common Stock ($3.1188 as adjusted for the Reserve Split).

The 2026 Private Placement closed on February 17, 2026 and we received net proceeds to the Company of approximately $5.4 million, after deducting placement agent fees and the payment of other offering expenses associated with the offering that were payable by the Company and excluding any deductions for make whole payments made to certain of the investors.

The Notes

The Notes are convertible, at the option of the holder, at any time after the date of issuance, into that number of shares of Common Stock equal to the principal amount of the Notes, plus all accrued and unpaid interest and late charges and any other unpaid amounts, at the Conversion Price of $0.281 per share ($5.62 as adjusted for the Reserve Split), subject to adjustment for any stock splits, stock dividends, recapitalizations and similar events. The holders of the Notes are prohibited from converting the Notes into shares of Common Stock if, as a result of such conversion, such holder, together with its affiliates, would beneficially own in excess of 4.99% (or, at the option of the holder, 9.99%) of the total number of shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding immediately after giving effect to such exercise.

The 2026 Notes are redeemable by us at any time, at our option, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to 110% of the sum of the principal amount to be redeemed plus accrued interest, if any.

The 2026 Notes contain customary events of default. If an event of default occurs, from and after the occurrence, and during the continuance of, an such event of default, the interest rate of the 2026 Notes shall automatically increase to 18% per annum until such event of default is cured. Additionally, if an event of default occurs, the holders of outstanding 2026 Notes may, regardless of whether such event of default has been cured, require the Company to redeem all or any portion of the outstanding Notes at a price equal to the greater of (i) the product of (A) the value of the 2026 Notes to be redeemed multiplied by (B) 110% and (ii) the product of (X) the value of the 2026 Notes to be redeemed, divided by the Conversion Price (the “Conversion Rate”), multiplied by (Y) the product of (1) 110% multiplied by (2) the greatest closing sale price of the Common Stock on any trading day during the period commencing on the date immediately preceding such event of default and ending on the date the Company makes the entire payment.

Pursuant to the 2026 Notes, the Company shall not enter into or be a party to a Fundamental Transaction (as such term is defined in the 2026 Notes) unless (i) the successor entity assumes in writing all of the obligations under the 2026 Notes and the other transaction documents and (ii) the successor entity is a publicly traded corporation whose common stock is quoted on or listed for trading on an eligible market, as set forth in the 2026 Notes. 

While the 2026 Notes are outstanding, subject to certain exempt issuances, if the Company sells, offers or grants any option or right to purchase, or otherwise disposes of or sells any equity security or equity-linked or related security, any convertible securities any preferred stock or other securities, the holders of outstanding Notes shall have the right, in their sole discretion, to require that the Company apply up to 30% of the gross proceeds from such sales or offers to redeem all, or any portion, of the outstanding Notes at a price equal to 110% of the amount of the Note being redeemed.

Without giving effect to any default interest or penalties which may accrue thereunder, assuming the full conversion of the 2026 Notes plus accrued interest in full into Common Stock without regard to any conversion limitations set forth in the 2026 Notes (assuming the 2026 Notes accrued interest at 12% for a period of thirteen (13) months), approximately 24,300,975 shares of Common Stock (1,215,049 as adjusted for the Reserve Split) would be issuable upon conversion.

Pursuant to the Second Warrants, the Company agreed to file a proxy statement with the SEC within 45 days of the Closing Date and hold a meeting of stockholders at the earliest practical date after the date following the filing thereof (and in no event later than 90 days after the Closing Date) (the “Stockholder Meeting Deadline”) for the purpose of obtaining such approval as may be required under the applicable rules of Nasdaq from the Company’s stockholders with respect to the issuance of all of the Warrant Shares upon the exercise of the Second Warrants in accordance with their terms (including adjustment provisions set forth therein) (the “Stockholder Approval”).

The Company agreed to use its reasonable best efforts to obtain such Stockholder Approval. If, despite the Company’s reasonable best efforts the Stockholder Approval is not obtained on or prior to the Stockholder Meeting Deadline, the Company is obligated to cause an additional stockholder meeting to be held on or prior to the 90th calendar day following the failure to obtain Stockholder Approval. If, despite the Company’s reasonable best efforts the Stockholder Approval is not obtained after such subsequent stockholder meetings, the Company shall cause an additional Stockholder Meeting to be held every 90 days thereafter until such Stockholder Approval is obtained, or (ii) the Second Warrants are no longer outstanding, whichever is sooner.

The Warrants

Exercise Price

The First Warrants are immediately exercisable upon issuance, have a term of six years from the date of issuance, and are exercisable for shares of Common Stock at a price of $0.15594 per share ($3.1188 as adjusted for the Reserve Split). The Second Warrants shall become exercisable on such date, if ever, that Stockholder Approval is obtained, have a term of six years from the date of Stockholder Approval, and will be exercisable for shares of Common Stock at a price of $0.15594 per share ($3.1188 as adjusted for the Reserve Split). The exercise price and number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the Warrants are subject to customary adjustments pursuant to stock dividends, stock splits or similar events.

Cashless Exercise

In the event there is no effective registration statement registering, or the prospectus contained therein is not available for the resale of the shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the Warrants (the “Warrant Shares”), the Warrants may be exercised, in whole or in part, by means of a “cashless exercise” in which case the holder will be entitled to receive a number of Warrant Shares equal to the quotient obtained by dividing, (x) (A) as applicable, the volume weighted average price (“VWAP”) of the Common Stock on the date immediately preceding the exercise date (if the notice of exercise is (1) both executed and delivered on a day that is not a Trading Day (as defined in the Warrant) or (2) both executed and delivered on a Trading Day prior to the opening of “regular trading hours) or the bid price of the Common Stock as of the time of the holder’s execution of the applicable notice of exercise (if the notice of exercise is executed during “regular trading hours” on a Trading Day), less the exercise price of the Warrant, multiplied by (B) the number of Warrant Shares that would be issuable upon exercise of the Warrant if the exercise were by means of a cash exercise rather than a cashless exercise, by (y) the price used in (A).

Fundamental Transaction

If a Fundamental Transaction (as such term is defined in the Warrant) occurs, then the successor entity will succeed to, and be substituted for the Company, and may exercise every right and power that the Company may exercise and will assume all of the Company’s obligations under the Warrants with the same effect as if such successor entity had been named in the Warrant itself. If holders of the Common Stock are given a choice as to the securities, cash or property to be received in a fundamental transaction, then the holder shall be given the same choice as to the consideration it receives upon any exercise of the Warrant following such Fundamental Transaction. In certain circumstances, the holder will have the right to receive the Black Scholes Value of the Warrant calculated pursuant to a formula set forth in the Warrants, payable either in cash or in the same type or form of consideration that is being offered and being paid to the holders of the Common Stock as described in the Warrants.

Commercial Credit Group Promissory Notes

Effective December 30, 2025, our wholly owned subsidiary Resource Group entered into a Negotiable Promissory Note and Security Agreement in the principal amount of $1,507,658 (the “First CCG Note”) and Negotiable Promissory Note and Security Agreement in the principal amount of $1,047,528 (the “Second CCG Note”; and together with the First CCG Note, the “CCG Notes”) with Commercial Credit Group (the “Lender”) to finance the purchase of a Komptech Crambo shredder and a Diamond Z horizontal grinder for approximately $2.54 million with a 30% down payment of approximately $700,000 that had previously been deployed under a rental arrangement.

The First CCG Note is payable as follows: the first installment of $265,266 was due on December 30, 2025, followed by 48 monthly installments of $25,879. The Second CCG Note is payable as follows: the first installment of $195,000 was due on December 30, 2025 followed by 48 monthly installments of $17,761. The Notes are secured by all the assets of RG Group of whatever nature and kind, wherever located, in which RG Group now or hereafter has any right or interest (the “Collateral”). Upon a default by RG Group (as defined in the CCG Notes), which includes, among other things, the failure to make any payment under the CCG Notes on the date on which such payment is due, the failure by RG Group to perform any other obligation under the CCG Notes, Lender at any time deeming the security afforded by the Notes unsafe, inadequate or at any risk or any of the Collateral in danger of misuse, concealment or misappropriation, the affairs of RG Group so evolve such that, in Lender’s sole discretion, Lender becomes insecure as to the performance of the CCG Notes, RG Group shall incur, create, assume, cause or suffer to exist any mortgage, trust, lien, security interest, pledge, hypothecation, other encumbrance (other than Lender’s interest), or attachment or execution of any kind whatsoever upon, affecting or with respect to the Collateral or any of Lender’s interests under the CCG Notes, RG Group shall sell, pledge, assign, rent, lease, lend, destroy or otherwise transfer or dispose of any Collateral or RG Group fails to obtain or maintain insurance on the Collateral satisfactory to Lender in its sole discretion, the rate of interest under the CCG Notes will automatically increase to at the maximum lawful rate permitted by law not to exceed eighteen percent (18.0%) per annum, RG Group is to immediately deliver possession of the Collateral to the Lender, and the Lender, without demand or notice, may, among other things, at its option accelerate the maturity of and declare the entire indebtedness under the Notes immediately due and payable and take possession of and sell all or part of the Collateral.

Austerra Restructuring

On December 31, 2025, the Company and Norman Berry II Owners, LLC (“NB Owners”), entered into a Restructuring and Collateral Agreement with Austerra to restructure the Company’s outstanding indebtedness of approximately $7.0 million (including accrued interest in excess of $750,000) originally issued by LV Peninsula and secured by the Lake Travis project site in Lago Vista, Texas.

Pursuant to the Restructuring Agreement, LV Peninsula entered into a Loan Modification Agreement securing $2.0 million of the remaining balance with its property in Durant, Oklahoma, bearing interest at 13.50% per annum with interest-only payments for 12 months and a maturity date of December 1, 2028. LV Peninsula also delivered a Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure conveying full title to the Lago Vista property to Austerra, conditionally extinguishing $5.0 million of the original secured debt. In connection therewith, LV Peninsula issued a conditional promissory note in the principal amount of $5,000,000, bearing interest at 13.50% per annum with interest-only payments for 12 months and a maturity date of December 1, 2028. The conditional note will automatically go into effect if, within 24 months of execution: (i) the development, construction, flood-plain remediation, and all material improvements to the Lago Vista property have not been substantially completed in accordance with the agreed project plan, or (ii) the entire outstanding indebtedness owed to Austerra, inclusive of the Oklahoma and Georgia property obligations, has not been paid in full. Upon sale of the Lago Vista property, the Company will receive 70% of any net sale proceeds in excess of $5.0 million (plus any additional new funds provided for finalization of the project, including accrued interest and/or penalties).

In addition, the Company entered into a Pledge Agreement pledging its 50% membership interest in Norman Berry to Austerra as collateral, and a Collateral Transfer Agreement granting Austerra a security interest in a $209,333 promissory note payable to the Company by Norman Berry. All obligations under the Restructuring Agreement are cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted across the Texas, Oklahoma, and Georgia properties.

Results of Operations

The below disclosure included in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition discusses the Company’s financial results for years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024. In June 2025, the Company acquired Resources Group and ZEI, and the operations of Resources Group and ZEI became the primary focus of the Company’s business. As a result of the acquisitions and change in focus of our core business, the year-to-year comparisons set forth below, and amounts reported in financial statements subsequent to June 2025, will materially change and the below will not be representative of, or directly comparable, to our future operating results.

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the dollar value represented by certain items in our Statements of Operations:

Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2025 and 2024

Revenues

During the year ended December 31, 2025, we generated revenues of $8,220,449 primarily from the sale of materials, including compost, engineered soils, and mulch, as well as from the collection, processing, and disposal of organic and construction-related waste. Revenues also included proceeds from converting a portion of collected waste into saleable materials. For the year ended December 31, 2024, we generated revenues from commissions on residential real estate purchases and sale transactions amounting to $207,552. This increase of $8,012,897 resulted from the acquisition of Resource Group during the year ended December 31, 2025.

Costs of Revenues

Cost of revenue for the year ended December 31, 2025, were $5,829,174 compared to $182,656 for the year ended December 31, 2024. This increase of $5,646,518 in costs resulted primarily from acquisitions that increased generated revenues during the year ended December 31, 2025. Gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2025 was $2,391,275, representing a gross margin of approximately 29%, reflecting the cost structure of our first partial year of integrating Resource Group’s organics processing and logistics operations.

Payroll and Related Expenses 

Payroll and related expenses for the year ended December 31, 2025 were $3,237,257 compared to $3,622,018 for the year ended December 31, 2024. This decrease of $384,761 in expenses resulted primarily from the recognition of vesting of restricted stock units during the year ended December 31, 2024.

General And Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2025 were $4,177,064 compared to $1,525,707 for the year ended December 31, 2024. This increase of $2,651,357 resulted primarily from additional expenses from the acquisition of Resource Group now being recognized.

Professional and Consulting Fees

Professional and consulting fees for the year ended December 31, 2025 were $2,575,502 compared to $963,768 for the year ended December 31, 2024. This increase of $1,611,734 in expenses resulted primarily from additional expenses from the acquisition of Resource Group now being recognized as well as an increase in transactions entered into during the year requiring professional fees.

Marketing and Business Development Expenses

Marketing and business development expenses for the year ended December 31, 2025 were $861,336 compared to $472,309 for the year ended December 31, 2024. This increase of $389,027 in expenses resulted primarily from increased spend in marketing activities during 2025.

Impairment Loss

Impairment loss for the year ended December 31, 2025 was $965,812 compared to $0 for the year ended December 31, 2024. This increase of $965,812 resulted directly from the impairment of technology related intangible assets.

Bad Debt Expenses

Bad debt expense for the year ended December 31, 2025 was $3,025,000 compared to $0 for the year ended December 31, 2024. This increase of $3,025,000 resulted directly from management’s assessment of the uncertainty of collectability of the Cumberland note receivable (a $4.5 million note issued in connection with JDI-Cumberland Inlet, LLC, which filed for bankruptcy in May 2025), against which the Company recorded a full allowance for credit losses.

Interest Expense 

During the year ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, we incurred $5,265,549 and $3,474,344 of interest expense. This increase of $1,791,205 resulted from an increase in the balance of our notes payable.

Change in Fair Value of Derivate Liability

The change in fair value for the year ended December 31, 2025 resulted in a gain of $2,034,868. This increase was primarily attributable to the remeasurement gain recognized on derivative liabilities during the period.

Impairment of Notes Receivable

For the year ended December 31, 2025, we recognized a loss of $818,172 related to the note receivable. The loss primarily reflects management’s assessment of the recoverability of the outstanding balance.

Income Tax Provision

A 100% valuation allowance was provided against the deferred tax asset consisting of available net operating loss carry forwards and, accordingly, no income tax benefit was provided. 

Liquidity and Capital Resources 

We have generated limited revenue and have incurred significant net losses in each year since inception. For the year ended December 31, 2025, we incurred a net loss of $15,957,099 as compared to a net loss of $8,908,475 for the year ended December 31, 2024. We expect to incur increasing losses in the future. As of December 31, 2025, and December 31, 2024, we had cash of $54,066 and $296,202, respectively. Prior to us becoming a public company, our operations were primarily being funded through advances from Safe & Green Holdings Corp. (“SG Holdings”), and we were largely dependent upon SG Holdings for funding. Since becoming a public company, we have funded our operations through note financing, project level financing, and the issuance of our equity and debt securities. See Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements; Note 8– Notes Payable and Notes Payable– Related Party. We intend to continue to finance our operations and finance Resource Group’s expansion from the proceeds of future financings, and/or sale proceeds from properties that are sold, and future revenues. Additional financing will be required to continue operations, which may not be available at acceptable terms, if at all. There is no guarantee we will be successful in raising capital outside of our current sources. In addition, under the October Purchase Agreement, we are subject to certain restrictive covenants that may make it difficult for us to procure additional financing. Our current cash is anticipated to be sufficient to fund operations through June 2026. We expect that we will need additional future financing which may not be available on acceptable terms, if at all. These and other factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The report of our independent registered public accounting firm includes an explanatory paragraph that our auditors have expressed substantial doubt that we will be able to continue as a going concern.

Financing Activities

The following table represents our financing activities during the year ending December 31, 2025. See Note 8 to the financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report for additional information regarding our financing activities.

LV Note

On April 3, 2024, LV Holding, entered into a Modification and Extension Agreement, effective as of April 1, 2024 (the “Extension Agreement”), to extend to April 1, 2025 the maturity date of a promissory note in the amount of $5,000,000 (the “LV Note”). As consideration for the Extension Agreement, LV Holding agreed to pay an extension fee of $50,000. Additionally, the Extension Agreement provided for the LV Note’s interest rate to be increased to a fixed rate of 17.00%. In addition, pursuant to a loan agreement dated April 3, 2024 (the “2nd Lien Loan Agreement”), LV Holding issued a promissory note, in the principal amount of $1,000,000 (the “2nd Lien Note”), secured by a revised Deed of Trust and Security Agreement, dated April 3, 2024 (the “Revised Deed of Trust”) on the Company’s Lago Vista site, and a Modification to Real Estate Mortgage, dated April 3, 2024 (“Mortgage Modification”), to the mortgage, dated March 30, 2023, on the Company’s McLean site in Durant, Oklahoma. The 2nd Lien Note is subordinate to the LV Note. The 2nd Lien Note required monthly installments of interest only at a fixed rate of 17.00%, had a maturity date of April 1, 2025and could be prepaid by LV Holding at any time without interest or penalty. LV Holding’s obligations under the 2nd Lien Note were guaranteed by the Company pursuant to a Guaranty, dated April 3, 2024.

As disclosed in Note 8 of the Notes to Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report , the Company entered into the Restructuring Agreement and Loan Modification Agreement. In accordance with the Loan Modification Agreement, the new maturity date of the remaining $2,000,000 principal balance is December 1, 2028, with an interest rate of 13.5% per annum.

BCV

On June 23, 2023, the Company entered into a Loan Agreement (the “BCV Loan Agreement”) with a Luxembourg-based specialized investment fund, BCV S&G DevCorp (“BCV S&G”), for up to $2,000,000 in proceeds, under which it initially received $1,250,000. The Loan Agreement provides that the loan provided thereunder will bear interest at 14% per annum and mature on December 1, 2024. The loan may be repaid by the Company at any time following the twelve-month anniversary of its issue date.

On April 11, 2025, BCV and the Company amended the BCV Loan Agreement (“Amendment No. 3”) to extend the maturity date of the note from December 1, 2024 to December 1, 2025. Additionally, BCV increased the principal balance of the note to $2,200,000.00 (two million two hundred thousand dollars). According to Amendment No. 3, the loan will now be primarily secured by 176,425 Treasury Shares and will be additionally secured by the $960,672 St Mary’s Note as well as the Cumberland Note, which is alternative collateral and only used if the note is in default. As of December 31, 2025, the principal balance was paid off.

On November 10, 2025, the Company entered into a new Loan Agreement (the “New BCV Loan Agreement”) with a Luxembourg-based specialized investment fund, BCV Renew Earth (“BCV Renew Earth”), for up to $5,000,000 in proceeds, under which it initially received $2,000,000. The Loan Agreement provides that the loan provided thereunder will bear interest at 14% per annum and mature on May 10, 2027. The BCV loan is primarily secured by the Company’s property in Durant, Oklahoma and its membership interest in Norman Berry Village. The Norman Berry Village interest serves as alternative collateral only

Leighton

On March 1, 2024, the Company entered into a credit agreement with the Bryan Leighton Revocable Trust Dated December 13, 2023 (the “Lender”) pursuant to which the Lender agreed to provide the Company with a line of credit facility (the “Line of Credit”) up to the maximum amount of $250,000 from which the Company may draw down, at any time and from time to time, during the term of the Line of Credit. The “Maturity Date “of the Line of Credit was September 1, 2024. At any time prior to the Maturity Date, upon mutual written consent of the Company and the Lender, the Maturity Date could be extended for up to an additional six-month period. The advanced and unpaid principal of the Line of Credit from time to time outstanding will bear interest at a fixed rate per annum equal to 12.0% (the “Fixed Rate”). On the first day of each month, the Company will pay to the Lender interest, in arrears, on the aggregate outstanding principal indebtedness of the Line of Credit at the Fixed Rate. The entire principal indebtedness of the Line of Credit and any accrued interest thereon will be due and payable on the Maturity Date. In consideration for the Line of Credit, on March 1, 2024, the Company issued 154,320 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock (386 as adjusted for the Stock Split) to Lender. The fair value of the shares issued to Lender amounted to $125,000 and has been recorded as a debt discount and will be amortized over the effective rate method. On November 12, 2024 the Company entered into Credit Extension Agreement (the “Extension”) for the agreement with the Bryan Leighton Revocable Trust dated December 13, 2023. The Extension extends the maturity date from September 1, 2024 to December 15, 2024. The Company paid an extension fee of $8,750 dollars and issued an additional 2,500 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock (125 as adjusted for the Reserve Split) as consideration for the extension. The rate of interest also increased from 12% per annum to 14% per annum retroactive to September 1, 2024.

On May 1, 2025, the Company entered into a consolidated promissory note agreement (the “Promissory Note”) with the Bryan Leighton Revocable Trust dated December 13, 2023 (the “Lender”), which supersedes and replaces the original credit agreement dated March 1, 2024, and the subsequent extension agreements dated October 21, 2024 and January 29, 2025 (collectively, the “Prior Agreements”). Under the terms of the Promissory Note, the outstanding obligations under the Prior Agreements were consolidated into a single principal amount of $273,917.81, which includes the original principal balance of $250,000, accrued interest of $8,917.81 through May 1, 2025, and an additional $15,000 agreed upon by the parties, which was recorded as interest expense. The Promissory Note bears interest at a fixed rate of 14.00% per annum and provides that accrued interest is payable monthly, in arrears, beginning June 1, 2025. The entire outstanding principal and accrued interest shall become due and payable on the earlier of (i) the completion of a capital raise by the Company in which gross proceeds equal or exceed $4,000,000 from one or more third-party investors, or (ii) October 28, 2025 (the “Maturity Date”). The Promissory Note may be prepaid in whole or in part at any time without premium or penalty, provided all accrued and unpaid interest is paid at the time of prepayment. The Promissory Note includes customary default provisions and represents the full and complete understanding of the parties, rendering the Prior Agreements null and void.

During the quarter ended on December 31, 2025, the Company paid off the principal balances of the outstanding amounts to Leighton.

1800 Diagonal

During the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2025, the Company issued ten promissory notes to 1800 Diagonal Lending LLC (“1800 Diagonal”) at a 10% original issue discount, for aggregate principal amounts of $162,400 and $870,900, respectively, in exchange for aggregate purchase prices of $136,000 and $745,000, respectively. The notes required monthly principal and interest payments and could be prepaid at any time without penalty. In connection with the notes, the Company incurred aggregate debt issuance costs of $106,000. As of December 31, 2025, notes totaling $478,610 in aggregate principal remained outstanding across five tranches (the 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, and 10th notes issued), with the remaining five notes fully repaid during 2024 and 2025.

Cedar

During the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2025, the Company entered into four cash advance agreements with Cedar Advance LLC (“Cedar”) pursuant to which the Company sold to Cedar an aggregate of $1,093,120 in future receivables for aggregate net proceeds of approximately $274,900. Each successive agreement was used in part to repay prior Cedar balances. Pursuant to the agreements, Cedar withdrew amounts weekly from the Company until the sold receivables were repaid. As of December 31, 2025, the outstanding balance under the Fourth Cash Advance Agreement (entered into March 13, 2025) was $427,000, with weekly payments of $9,000 continuing until repaid.

Arena

On August 12, 2024, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement, dated August 12, 2024 (the “Arena Purchase Agreement”) with the purchasers named therein (“Arena Investors”) related to a private placement of up to five tranches of secured convertible debentures after satisfaction of certain conditions specified in the Arena Purchase Agreement in the aggregate principal amount of $10,277,777 (the “Arena Debentures”) together with warrants to purchase a number of shares of the Company’s common stock equal to 20% of the total principal amount of the Arena Debentures sold divided by 92.5% of the lowest daily VWAP (as defined in the Arena Purchase Agreement) and subject to a floor price of $0.045 ($18 as adjusted for the Stock Split) (subject to proportional adjustment for stock splits), for the Company’s common stock during the ten consecutive trading day period preceding the respective closing dates (the “Arena Warrants”).

The closing of the first tranche was consummated on August 12, 2024 (the “First Closing Date”) and the Company issued to the Arena Investors 10% original issue discount secured convertible debentures in the aggregate principal amount of $1,388,889 (the “First Closing Arena Debentures”) and warrants (the “First Closing Arena Warrants”) to purchase up to and aggregate of 1,299,242 shares of the Company’s common stock (3,248 as adjusted for the Stock Split). The First Closing Arena Debentures were sold to Arena Investors for a purchase price of $1,250,000, representing an original issue discount of ten percent (10%). In connection with the closing, the Company incurred $175,000 of debt issuance costs. In connection with the closing of the first tranche, the Company reimbursed the Debenture Selling Stockholders $55,000 for their legal fees and expenses In addition, the initial fair value of the First Closing Arena Warrants, as described below, amounted to $214,267 and has been recorded as a debt discount and will be amortized over the effective rate method.

Each First Closing Arena Debenture had a maturity date of eighteen months from its date of issuance and bore interest at a rate of 10% per annum paid-in-kind (“PIK Interest”) unless there was an event of default under the applicable First Closing Arena Debenture. The PIK Interest was added to the outstanding principal amount of the applicable First Closing Arena Debenture on a monthly basis as additional principal obligations thereunder for all purposes thereof (including the accrual of interest thereon at the rates applicable to the principal amount generally). Each First Closing Arena Debenture was convertible, at the option of the holder, at any time, into such number of shares of the Company’s common stock equal to the principal amount of such First Closing Arena Debenture plus all accrued and unpaid interest at a conversion price equal to the lesser of (i) $0.279 ($111.60 as adjusted for the Stock Split), and (ii) 92.5% of the lowest daily volume weighted average price (VWAP) of the Company’s common stock during the ten trading day period ending on such conversion date, subject to adjustment for any stock splits, stock dividends, recapitalizations and similar events, as well as anti-dilution price protection provisions, and subject to a floor price of $0.045 ($18 as adjusted for the Stock Split) (subject to proportional adjustment for stock splits).

The First Closing Arena Debentures were redeemable by the Company at a redemption price equal to 115% of the sum of the principal amount to be redeemed plus accrued interest, if any. While the First Closing Arena Debentures were outstanding, if the Company or any of its subsidiaries received cash proceeds from the issuance of certain equity or indebtedness, the Arena Investors had the right to require the Company to immediately apply up to 20% of all proceeds received by the Company to repay the outstanding amounts owed under the First Closing Arena Debentures.

The First Closing Arena Warrants expire five years from its date of issuance. The First Closing Arena Warrants are exercisable, at the option of the holder, at any time, for up to 1,299,242 of shares of the Company’s common stock (3,248 as adjusted for the Stock Split) at an exercise price equal to $0.279 ($111.60 as adjusted for the Stock Split), subject to adjustment for any stock splits, stock dividends, recapitalizations, and similar events, as well as anti-dilution price protection provisions that are subject to a floor price as set forth in the First Closing Arena Warrants. The First Closing Arena Warrants provide for cashless exercise under certain circumstances.

The Company entered into a Registration Rights Agreement, dated August 12, 2024 (the “First Closing RRA”), with the Arena Investors where the Company agreed to file with the SEC an initial registration statement within 30 days to register the maximum number of Registrable Securities (as defined in the First Closing RRA) issuable under the First Closing Arena Debentures and the First Closing Arena Warrants as shall be permitted to be included thereon in accordance with applicable SEC rules. The Company filed a registration statement registering the securities issuable upon conversion or exercise of the First Closing Arena Debentures and First Closing Arena Warrants, in order to satisfy its obligations under the First Closing RRA, and such registration statement was declared effective by the SEC on September 30, 2024. In the event the number of shares available under such registration statement is insufficient to cover the securities issuable upon conversion or exercise of the First Closing Arena Debentures or First Closing Arena Warrants, the Company is obligated to file one or more new registration statements until such time as all securities issuable upon conversion or exercise of the First Closing Arena Debentures or First Closing Arena Warrants have been included in registration statements that have been declared effective and the prospectus contained therein is available for use by the Arena Investors.

Pursuant to the Arena Purchase Agreement, the Company and Arena Investors closed on a second tranche on October 25, 2024 and third tranche, upon which the Company issued and sold to Arena Investors on the same terms and conditions as the First Closing Arena Debenture a 10% original issue discount secured convertible debentures each in the principal amount of $2,222,222 (the “Additional Closing Arena Debentures”) except for the conversion price ad floor price described below sand a warrant (the “Additional Closing Warrants”) to purchase a number of shares of the Company’s common stock equal to 20% of the total principal amount of the Additional Closing Arena Debentures divided by 92.5% of the lowest daily VWAP (as defined in the Arena Purchase Agreement) and subject to a floor price of $0.045 ($18 as adjusted for the Stock Split) (subject to proportional adjustment for stock splits), for the common stock during the ten consecutive trading day period ended on the last trading day immediately preceding the closing of the additional tranches.

The Additional Closing Arena Debentures were sold to Arena Investors each for a purchase price of $2,000,000, representing an original issue discount of ten percent (10%). In connection with each closing of the additional tranches, the Company entered into a registration rights agreement pursuant to which the Company agreed to register the maximum number of shares of the Company’s common stock issuable under the Second and Third Closing Debentures and the Second and Third Closing Arena Warrants with terms substantially similar as the terms provided in the RRA. The Company also agreed to reimburse Arena Investors for its legal fees and expenses related to each such closing.

The Arena Purchase Agreement prohibited the Company from entering into a Variable Rate Transaction (other than the Arena ELOC described below) until such time as no Arena Debentures remain outstanding. In addition, the Arena Purchase Agreement provided that neither the Company nor any subsidiary may issue, during specified time periods, any common stock or common stock equivalents, except for certain exempted issuances (i.e., stock options, employee grants, shares issuable pursuant to outstanding securities, acquisitions and strategic transactions) and the Arena ELOC.

The Company entered into a Security Agreement, dated August 12, 2024 (the “Security Agreement”), with Arena Investors where it granted the Arena Investors a security interest in all of its assets to secure the prompt payment, performance and discharge in full of all of the Company’s obligations under the Arena Debentures. In addition, each of the Company’s subsidiaries entered into a Guaranty Agreement, dated August 12, 2024 (the “Subsidiary Guaranty”), with Arena Investors pursuant to which they agreed to guarantee the prompt payment, performance and discharge in full of all of the Company’s obligations under the Arena Debentures.

The Second Closing Debentures were to mature eighteen months from their date of issuance and bore interest at a rate of 10% per annum paid-in-kind (“PIK Interest”), unless there is an event of default under the applicable Second Closing Debenture. The PIK Interest was to be added to the outstanding principal amount of the applicable Second Closing Debenture on a monthly basis as additional principal obligations thereunder for all purposes thereof (including the accrual of interest thereon at the rates applicable to the principal amount generally). Each Second Closing Debenture was convertible, at the option of the holder, at any time, into such number of shares of the Company’s common stock equal to the principal amount of such Second Closing Debenture plus all accrued and unpaid interest at a conversion price equal to the lesser of (i) $3.48 ($69.60 as adjusted for the Reserve Split), and (ii) 92.5% of lowest daily volume weighted average price (VWAP) of the Company’s common stock during the ten trading day period ending on such conversion date (the “Conversion Price”), subject to adjustment for any stock splits, stock dividends, recapitalizations and similar events, as well as anti-dilution price protection provisions, and subject to a floor price of $0.90 (subject to proportional adjustment for stock splits) ($18 as adjusted for the Reserve Split). Based upon the floor price, the maximum number of shares issuable upon conversion of the Second Closing Debentures was 3,268,197 shares of common stock (163,410 as adjusted for the Reserve Split). In connection with the closing of the second tranche, the Company reimbursed Arena Investors $10,000 for its legal fees and expenses. In addition, the initial fair value of the Second Closing Arena Warrants, as described below, amounted to $390,939 and has been recorded as a debt discount and will be amortized over the effective rate method.

The Second Closing Warrants expire five years from their date of issuance. The Second Closing Warrants are exercisable, at the option of the holder, at any time, for up to 170,892 shares of the Company’s common stock (8,545 as adjusted for the Reserve Split) at an exercise price equal to $3.476 ($69.52 as adjusted for the Reserve Split), subject to adjustment for any stock splits, stock dividends, recapitalizations, and similar events, as well as anti-dilution price protection provisions. The Second Closing Warrants provide for cashless exercise under certain circumstances.

The Company entered into a Registration Rights Agreement, dated October 25, 2024 (the “Second Closing RRA”), with the Arena Investors where it agreed to file with the SEC an initial registration statement within 30 days to register the maximum number of Registrable Securities (as defined in the RRA) issuable under the Second Closing Debentures and the Second Closing Warrants as shall be permitted to be included thereon in accordance with applicable SEC rules and to use its reasonable best efforts to have the registration statement declared effective by the SEC no later than the “Second Registration Statement Effectiveness Date”, which is defined in the Arena Purchase Agreement as the 30th calendar day following the Second Closing Date (or, in the event of a “full review” by the SEC, no later than the 120th calendar day following the Second Closing Date); provided, however, that if the registration statement will not be reviewed or is no longer subject to further review and comments, the Second Registration Statement Effectiveness Date will be the fifth trading day following the date on which the Company is so notified if such date precedes the date otherwise required above. Such registration statement was declared effective by the SEC on November 26, 2024.

On October 31, 2024, the Company and the Arena Investors entered into a Global Amendment No. 2 to the First Closing Arena Debentures. Pursuant to the Amendment, the parties to the First Closing Arena Debentures, in order to comply with Nasdaq rules, amended the First Closing Arena Debentures to provide that the Floor Price was set at a fixed price subject to proportional adjustment for stock splits and deleted the prior language which allowed for the floor price to be reduced upon the written consent of the Company and the holder.

On April 4, 2025, the Company closed the third tranche of its private placement offering with the Arena Investors) under the Arena Purchase Agreement to which the Company issued 10% convertible debentures (the “Third Closing Debentures”) in the aggregate principal amount of Five Hundred Fifty Five Thousand Five Hundred Fifty Five Dollars ($555,555) to the Arena Investors and warrants (the “Third Closing Warrants”) to purchase up to 461,043 shares of the Company’s common stock (23,052 as adjusted for the Reserve Stock Split). The Third Closing Debentures were sold to the Arena Investors for a purchase price of $500,000, representing an original issue discount of ten percent (10%).

The Third Closing Debentures were to mature eighteen months from their date of issuance and bore interest at a rate of 10% per annum paid-in-kind (“PIK Interest”), unless there is an event of default under the applicable Third Closing Debenture. The PIK Interest was to be added to the outstanding principal amount of the applicable Third Closing Debenture on a monthly basis as additional principal obligations thereunder for all purposes thereof (including the accrual of interest thereon at the rates applicable to the principal amount generally). Each Third Closing Debenture is convertible, at the option of the holder, at any time, into such number of shares of the Company’s common stock equal to the principal amount of such Third Closing Debenture plus all accrued and unpaid interest at a conversion price equal to the lesser of (i) $1.62 ($32.40 as adjusted for the Reserve Stock Split), and (ii) 92.5% of lowest daily volume weighted average price (“VWAP”) of the Company’s common stock during the ten trading day period ending on such conversion date (the “Conversion Price”), subject to adjustment for any stock splits, stock dividends, recapitalizations and similar events, as well as anti-dilution price protection provisions, and subject to a floor price of $0.90 ($18 as adjusted for the Reserve Split) (subject to proportional adjustment for stock splits). Based upon the floor price, the maximum number of shares issuable upon conversion of the Third Closing Debentures is 461,043 shares of common stock (23,052 as adjusted for the Reserve Split). In connection with the closing of the third tranche, the Company reimbursed Arena Investors $20,000 for its legal fees and expenses. In addition, the initial fair value of the Third Closing Arena Warrants, as described below, amounted to $285,386 and has been recorded as a debt discount and will be amortized over the effective rate method.

The Third Closing Warrants expire five years from their date of issuance. The Third Closing Warrants are exercisable, at the option of the holder, at any time, for up to 461,043 shares of the Company’s common stock (23,052 as adjusted for the Reserve Stock Split) at an exercise price equal to $1.62 ($32.40 as adjusted for the Reserve Stock Split), subject to adjustment for any stock splits, stock dividends, recapitalizations, and similar events, as well as anti-dilution price protection provisions. The Third Closing Warrants provide for cashless exercise under certain circumstances.

During the year ended December 31, 2025, $1,450,000 in principal and interest due under the Arena Debentures were converted into 980,141 shares of the Company’s common stock (49,007 as adjusted for the Reserve Split) within the terms of such Debentures, and there was no gain or loss recognized.

A Forbearance Agreement dated as of July 29, 2025 (the “Assign Agreement”) was entered into by and between the Company and Mill End Capital LTD, North York LTD, Indigo Capital LLC and Strategic EP LLC (each, a “Holder” and together the “Holders”), being the assignees of all rights under the Arena Debentures held by Arena initially issued to the Arena Investors. At the time of the Assign Agreement, the outstanding debt from the First Closing Arena Debenture, totaled $138,889, the outstanding debt from the Second Closing Arena Debenture totaled $772,222, and the outstanding debt from the Third Closing Debenture, totaled $550,000. In accordance with the Assign Agreement Mill End Capital LTD acquired $309,906 of the outstanding debt, North York LTD acquired $309,906 of the outstanding debt, Indigo Capital LLC acquired $309,906 of the outstanding debt and Strategic EP LLC acquired $531,392 of the outstanding debt. During the year ended December 31, 2025, $828,158 of outstanding in principal from these investors were converted into 1,031,634 shares of the Company’s common stock (51,581 as adjusted for the Reserve Split) within the terms of such Debentures, and there was no gain or loss recognized.

As of December 31, 2025, there was no principal balance remaining on such debentures.

Resource Group Membership Interest Purchase Agreement

On June 2, 2025, the Company entered into an Amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Membership Interest Purchase Agreement, dated February 25, 2025, (the “Resource Group MIPA”) with Resource Group US Holdings LLC, a Florida limited liability company (“Resource Group”), and the members of Resource Group (the “Equityholders”). The Amendment altered the consideration to be paid by the Company to the Equityholders in connection with the purchase of 100% of the membership interests of Resource Group. Pursuant to the Amendment, the purchase price for the membership interests of Resource Group was amended to be comprised of (i) $480,000 in principal amount of unsecured 6% promissory notes due on the first anniversary of the closing, (ii) the issuance of shares of the Company’s restricted common stock (the “Closing Shares”) equal to 19.99% of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock on the date the Resource Group MIPA was executed; and (iii) 1,500,000 shares of a newly designated series of non-voting Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series A Preferred Stock”) (which, subject to the approval of the Company’s stockholders and The Nasdaq Stock Market (“Nasdaq”) not objecting to the conversion and the Company continuing to meet and being eligible to meet the Nasdaq continued listing requirements after conversion), would be convertible into 9,000,000 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock (450,000 as adjusted for the Reserve Split)). The Amendment also provides that, subject to shareholder approval, that the Company will issue an aggregate of 41,182 additional shares of Company common stock (2,059 as adjusted for the Reserve Split) to the Equityholders upon the approval of such issuance by the Company’s stockholders at the Company’s stockholders’ meeting and provided that the Company continues to meet and is eligible to meet the Nasdaq continued listing requirements.

Peak One

On June 26, 2025, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement, dated June 26, 2025 (the “Peak Purchase Agreement”), with an institutional investor (the “Peak Investor”), pursuant to which the Company issued to the Peak Investor a 10% convertible debenture (the “Peak Debenture”) in the principal amount of $172,500 in a private placement offering. The Debenture was sold to the Peak Investor for a purchase price of $155,000, representing an original issue discount of ten percent (10%). In connection with the closing of the first tranche, the Company paid $5,000 as a non-accountable fee to the Peak Investor to cover its accounting fees, legal fees and other transactional costs and issued to the Peak Investor and its designee an aggregate total of 100,000 shares of its restricted common stock (5,000 as adjusted for the Reserve Split) (the “Commitment Shares”) as described in the Peak Purchase Agreement.

The Peak Debenture had a maturity date of twelve months from its date of issuance and bore interest at a rate of 10% per annum payable on the maturity date. The Peak Debenture was unsecured and subordinated to the outstanding 10% Original Issue Discount Secured Convertible Debentures issued to the Arena Investors (as defined below) by the Company. The Peak Debenture was convertible, at the option of the holder, at any time on or after the earlier of (i) March 23, 2026 or (ii) the date that the Arena Debentures (as defined below) are extinguished, into such number of shares of common stock of the Company equal to the principal amount of the Peak Debenture plus all accrued and unpaid interest at a conversion price equal to the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the trading day immediately preceding the conversion date, subject to adjustment for any stock splits, stock dividends, recapitalizations and similar events, as well as anti-dilution price protection provisions that are subject to a floor price of $0.19 ($3.80 as adjusted for the Reserve Split) (the “Floor Price”).

The Peak Debenture was redeemable by the Company at a redemption price equal to 110% of the sum of the principal amount to be redeemed plus accrued interest, if any. While the Peak Debenture is outstanding, if the Company received cash proceeds of more than $500,000 (“Minimum Threshold”) in the aggregate from any source or series of related or unrelated sources, the Company was obligated to, within two (2) business days of the Company’s receipt of such proceeds, inform the holder of such receipt, following which the holder shall have the right in its sole discretion to require the Company to immediately apply up to 100% of all proceeds received by the Company (from any source except with respect to proceeds from the issuance of equity or debt to officers and directors of the Company) after the Minimum Threshold is reached to repay the outstanding amounts owed under the Debenture.

The Peak Debenture contained customary events of default. If an event of default occurs, until it is cured, the Peak Investor could increase the interest rate applicable to the Peak Debenture to the lesser of eighteen percent (18%) per annum and the maximum interest rate allowable under applicable law and accelerate the full indebtedness under the Peak Debenture, in an amount equal to 110% of the outstanding principal amount and accrued and unpaid interest. Subject to limited exceptions set forth in the Peak Debenture, the Peak Debenture prohibited the Company from entering into a Variable Rate Transaction (as defined in the Debenture) or incurring any new indebtedness that is senior to the Peak Debenture or secured by the assets of the Company until the Peak Debenture was paid in full.

The Peak Purchase Agreement provided the Peak Investor with “piggy-back” registration rights, if the Company filed with the SEC a registration statement covering any of its securities, to use its reasonable efforts to effect the registration of the maximum number of Registrable Securities (as defined in the Purchase Agreement) as shall be permitted to be included thereon in accordance with applicable SEC rules.

During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company redeemed the Peak Debenture.

Index Equity

On August 22, 2025 the Company entered into a Promissory Note, dated August 22, 2025 (the “Index 2025 Note”) with Index Equity US, LLC (the “Lender”) for the principal amount of $200,000. Under the terms of the Index 2025 Note the Company was required to make payments of accrued, unpaid interest and outstanding principal, subject to adjustment, in the amount of $240,000 on or before the maturity date of October 21, 2025. However, if the Note was not fully funding, meaning the Lender has not disbursed the full $200,000 in funding installments—the Company was obligated to repay, in lieu of the full potential funding amount, a sum equal to 120% of the total amount actually funded and disbursed by the Lender under this Index 2025 Note. The repayment obligation in the event of partial funding is calculated as the funded amount multiplied by 1.20 and was due and payable in full on or before the Maturity Date. During the quarter ended on December 31, 2025, the Company repaid the principal balances.

Boot Capital

On December 15, 2025, the Company issued a promissory note (the “Boot Capital Note”) in favor of Boot Capital LLC in the principal amount of $87,750 for a purchase price of $75,000, representing an original issue discount of $12,750. Under the terms of the Boot Capital Note, beginning on January 15, 2026, the Company is required to make payments of accrued, unpaid interest and outstanding principal, subject to adjustment, in the amount of $14,874. The Company has the right to accelerate payments or prepay in full at any time with no prepayment penalty. As of December 31, 2025 the principal balance amounted to $87,750.

Sixth Borough Partners

On October 8, 2025, the Company issued a promissory note (the “Sixth Borough Note”) in favor of Sixth Borough Partners LLC in the principal amount of $250,000. The note bears no interest, and the principal amount is due and payable on the sixth month anniversary of the issuance date, or the date of a qualified financing event as defined in the note. As of December 31, 2025 the principal balance amounted to $250,000.

Cash Flow Summary 

Operating activities used net cash of $7,030,824 during the year ended December 31, 2025, compared to $2,676,353 during the year ended December 31, 2024. The primary drivers of cash used in operating activities during 2025 were the Company’s net loss of $15,957,099 and the $3,025,000 bad debt provision on the Cumberland note receivable, partially offset by non-cash charges including $965,812 of impairment expense, $1,046,836 of depreciation, $586,124 of amortization, and $2,083,887 of debt discount amortization, as well as a $2,034,868 gain on the change in fair value of derivative liabilities. Changes in operating assets and liabilities contributed $523,976. Cash used in operating activities during 2024 was primarily driven by the Company’s net loss, partially offset by non-cash stock-based compensation and common stock issued for debt issuance costs.

Investing activities used net cash of $3,348,955 during the year ended December 31, 2025, and used $711,192 net cash during the year ended December 31, 2024, which is an increase in cash used of $2,630,408. The cash used during the year ended December 31, 2025 results from the purchase of property and equipment of $3,622,839, increase in intangible assets of $7,779, cash from asset acquisitions of $309,557, additions to equity-based investments of $210,833, and an increase in project development costs of $4,950. Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2025, we recognized $177,989 from discontinued operations. The cash used during the year ended December 31, 2024 results from the purchase of property and equipment of $3,488, increase in intangible assets of $293,593, cash used in asset acquisitions of $153,593, $371,500 of joint venture activity, and an increase in project development costs of $30,900. Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2024, we recognized $403,738 from proceeds from the sale of land.

Cash provided from financing activities was $10,206,079 during the year ended December 31, 2025, which resulted from $904,573 debt issuance costs paid, increased by $11,287,818 proceeds from short-term note payable, $8,881,245 in repayments of short-term notes payable, $111,560 payments on finance lease, $68 from payment related to stock splits, increase of $8,623,006 from issuance of stock and $233,414 from warrant exercises, $33,358 from make whole payments, and decrease of $7,355 from discontinued operations. Cash provided from financing activities was $3,612,075 during the year ended December 31, 2024, which resulted from additional debt issuance costs of $2,525,763, proceeds from short-term notes payable of $6,928,277, repayment of short-term notes payable of $1,552,742, proceeds from the issuance of common stock of $750,719, proceeds from the issuance of common stock from prefunded warrants of $11,584.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, we had no material off-balance sheet arrangements to which we are a party.

Critical Accounting Estimates

Our financial statements have been prepared using generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”). In connection with the preparation of the financial statements, we are required to make assumptions and estimates and apply judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, and expenses, and the related disclosures. We base our assumptions, estimates, and judgments on historical experience, current trends, and other factors that we believe to be relevant at the time the financial statements are prepared. On a regular basis, we review the accounting policies, assumptions, estimates, and judgments to ensure that our financial statements are presented fairly and in accordance with GAAP. However, because future events and their effects cannot be determined with certainty, actual results could differ from our assumptions and estimates, and such differences could be material.

Our significant accounting policies are discussed in “Note 2— Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” of the notes to our financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 included elsewhere in this Annual Report. We believe that the following accounting policies are the most critical in fully understanding and evaluating our reported financial results.

Investment Entities – On May 31, 2021, we agreed to contribute $600,000 to acquire a 50% membership interest in Norman Berry II Owner LLC (“Norman Berry”). We contributed $350,329 and $114,433 of the initial $600,000 in the second quarter and third quarter of 2021 respectively, with the remaining $135,183 funded in the fourth quarter of 2021. The purpose of the investment in Norman Berry is to develop and provide affordable housing in the Atlanta, Georgia metropolitan area. We have determined we are not the primary beneficiary of Norman Berry and thus will not consolidate the activities in our financial statements. The Company will use the equity method to report the activities as an investment in its consolidated financial statements. As of December 31, 2025 we continued to hold a 50% interest in Norman Berry.

On June 24, 2021, we entered into an operating agreement with Jacoby Development for a 10% non-dilutable equity interest for JDI-Cumberland Inlet, LLC (“Cumberland”). We contributed $3,000,000 for its 10% equity interest. During the year ended December 31, 2023, we contributed an additional $25,000. The purpose of the investment in Cumberland is to develop a waterfront parcel in a mixed-use destination community. We have determined we are not the primary beneficiary of Cumberland and thus will not consolidate the activities in our consolidated financial statements. We will use the equity method to report the activities as an investment in our consolidated financial statements. 

On February 11, 2025, we entered into an Amendment (this “February Amendment”) to the Operating Agreement, dated June 24, 2021 (the “Operating Agreement”), for Cumberland, by and between us and Jacoby Development Inc., a Georgia corporation (“JDI”), and a Forced Sale Agreement by and between us and JDI, pursuant to which Cumberland acquired the Company’s 10% equity interest (the “LLC Interest”) in Cumberland in exchange for a promissory note (the “Cumberland Note”) from Cumberland in the principal amount of $4.5 million. The Cumberland Note bears interest at the rate of 6.5% per annum, matures on February 6, 2026 and is secured by a pledge of a 10% equity interest in Cumberland. Payment of the Cumberland Note is also guaranteed by JDI. Due to uncertainty in the collection of the Cumberland Note as of December 31, the 2025, we have recorded an allowance for credit losses in the amount of $4,500,000. As of December 31, 2025, due to possible the uncollectability of the Cumberland Note the company has recorded an allowance for credit losses in the amount of $4,500,000, which resulted in bad debt expense of $3,025,000 and a reserve of $1,475,000 against a deferred gain on sale.  

During the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, Norman Berry and Sugar Phase did not have any material earnings or losses as the investments are in development. In addition, management believes there was no impairment as of December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024. 

As of December 31, 2025, the Company’s balance of equity-based investments is for its remaining investment in Norman Berry. As of December 31, 2024 the Company’s balance of equity-based investments related to its $3,000,000 investment in Cumberland and $642,607 investment in Norman Berry.  

Derivative liability — The Company evaluates all features contained in financing agreements to determine if there are any embedded derivatives that require separate accounting from the underlying agreement under ASC 815 – Derivatives and Hedging. An embedded derivative that requires separation is accounted for as a separate liability or asset from the host agreement. The separated embedded derivative is accounted for at fair market value, with changes in fair value recognized in the statements of operations within the other financing costs line item. The Company determined that certain features under the October Private Placement (See Note 11 — Stockholders’ Equity) qualified as an embedded derivative. The derivative was accounted for separately from the underlying Series B Preferred Stock and is accounted for at fair value.

Revenue recognition – The Company determines, at contract inception, whether it will transfer control of a promised good or service over time or at a point in time, regardless of the length of contract or other factors. The recognition of revenue aligns with the timing of when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve this core principle, the Company applies the following five steps in accordance with its revenue policy:

The revenue the Company has generated to date resulted from commissions related to residential real estate purchases and sales transactions, as noted below, as well as the sale of land held. For revenue from commissions related to residential real estate purchased and sales transactions, the Company applies recognition of revenue when the customer obtains control over such service, which is at a point in time. Revenue from commissions amounted to $18,170 and $207,552 for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 respectively.

The Company recognizes revenue from the sale of materials (compost, soil and mulch) as well as the collection and disposal services of waste, which at times, is produced into saleable materials. Such revenue is recognized at the point in time when control of the product transfers to the customer, which typically occurs upon delivery or customer pickup at the Company’s facility.

Revenue from the sale of materials amounted to $8,202,279 and $0 for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

JOBS Act

The JOBS Act permits an emerging growth company such as us to take advantage of an extended transition period to comply with new or revised accounting standards applicable to public companies until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We have elected to avail ourselves of the extended transition period for complying with new or revised financial accounting standards.

We will remain an emerging growth company until the earliest of (i) the last day of the fiscal year (a) following the fifth anniversary of the date of the first sale of our common stock pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act, (b) in which we have total annual revenue of at least $1.235 billion, or (c) in which we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer, which generally means the market value of our common equity that is held by nonaffiliates exceeds $700 million as of the end of the prior fiscal year’s second fiscal quarter; and (2) the date on which we have issued more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt securities during the prior three-year period.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information required under this item.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

The information required by this Item is set forth in the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto beginning on page F-1 of this of this Annual Report.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation, as of the end of the period covered by this report, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e). Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e), were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

(b) Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that:

Due to its inherent limitations, any system of internal control over financial reporting, no matter how well defined, may not prevent or detect misstatements. In addition, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, based on the framework set forth in Internal Control — Integrated Framework by The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) (2013). Based on this assessment using this framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2025.

Remediation of Previously Identified Material Weakness

As disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, and our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2025, we identified a material weakness in our controls relating to the ineffective design of certain management review controls across a portion of the Company’s financial statements. Specifically, the controls related to the review of internal and externally prepared reports and analysis utilized in the financial reporting process of outside consultants that aid in the preparation of our financial statements.

During the third quarter of 2025, we completed the remediation of the previously identified material weakness. Remediation was achieved by expanding our finance function through the engagement of additional consulting personnel, bringing the team to seven professionals, including a partner, director, controller, and senior accountants. We also enhanced our internal review procedures by implementing improved documentation, multi-level review steps, and more structured period-end close processes.

Notwithstanding the material weakness that existed during a portion of the fiscal year, management has concluded that the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025 present fairly, in all material respects, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with GAAP.

This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting because the Company is not an accelerated filer or a large accelerated filer, and it is not subject to the attestation requirement.

(c) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, we remediated the previously identified material weakness as described above. Except as noted, there was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2025 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls

Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. The design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Further, because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Projections of any evaluation of controls effectiveness to future periods are subject to risks. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures.

Item 9B. Other Information.

10b5-1 Trading Arrangements

During the fourth quarter of 2025, none of our directors or executive officers adopted or terminated any “Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” or “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” (as each term is defined in Item 408(a) of Registration S-K).

Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections.

Not applicable.

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

Executive Officers

The following table sets forth information as of December 31, 2025 regarding the individuals who currently serve as executive officers of RenX.

Set forth below is biographical information about our executive officers identified above.

David Villarreal has served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of SG DevCo since February 3, 2023. Mr. Villarreal was appointed as a director of RenX effective April 11, 2023 and has served as a director of SG Holdings from May 28, 2021 until October 22, 2024. Mr. Villarreal’s career spans over 40 years in various management, business and leadership capacities, beginning in 1977 when he served as Deputy Mayor and Senior Deputy Economic Development Advisor, under Mayor Tom Bradley in the City of Los Angeles. From August 2014 until March 2023, Mr. Villarreal served as the Chief Administrative Officer of affinity Partnerships, LLC, a Costco national mortgage services platform provider, with annual closed loan production of $8+ billion through a network of ten national mortgage lenders. From March 2011 to August 2014, he served as the President -Corporate Business Development, of Prime Source Mortgage, Inc. From September 2008 to September 2012, he served as a Consultant to the International Brotherhood of Teamsters.

Nicolai Brune has served as the Chief Financial Officer of RenX since February 14, 2023. From March 2022 to February 2023, Mr. Brune served as Director of Acquisition for SG Holdings responsible for financial evaluation and modeling of all potential acquisitions, investments and divestitures. Prior to joining SG Holdings, Mr. Brune served as a Treasury Analyst at GL Homes, a large private real estate developer/home builder in the state of Florida, from June 2020 to March 2022. At GL Homes, Mr. Brune was tasked with reviewing financial transactions, examining cash flows and maintaining and preparing monthly performance reports. From June 2017 until June 2020, Mr. Brune worked at Generation Nine, a company that he founded in the clothing industry.

Directors

Subject to the rights of holders of any series of our preferred stock with respect to the election of directors, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides for our Board of Directors to be divided into three classes. The directors designated as Class I directors have terms expiring at the 2027 annual meeting of stockholders, and each director nominee elected to succeed any such Class I director as a Class I director will hold office for a three-year term and until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified or until his or her earlier death, resignation or removal. The directors designated as Class II directors have terms expiring at the 2028 annual meeting of stockholders, and each director nominee elected to succeed any such Class II director as a Class II director will hold office for a three-year term and until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified or until his or her earlier death, resignation or removal. The directors designated as Class III directors have terms expiring at the 2026 annual meeting of stockholders, and each director nominee elected to succeed any such Class III director as a Class III director will hold office for a three-year term and until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified or until his or her earlier death, resignation or removal.

The following table sets forth information as of March 31, 2026 regarding the individuals who currently serve on RenX’s Board of Directors and who will continue to serve on our Board of Directors until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified, together with the class designation of each such director.

Set forth below is biographical information about our directors identified above, as well as a description of the specific skills and qualifications such directors provide to our Board of Directors.

James D. Burnham was appointed as a director of RenX effective June 17, 2025. Mr. Burnham has served as the President of JDB Consulting Services, Inc. since October 2003. He has over 30 years of experience in mergers and acquisitions and project development, having commenced his career at Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc. At JDB Consulting Services, Mr. Burnham has principally served as a consultant to various clients interested in acquisition and project development related services (primarily within the solid waste and related industries). Services include business valuation, business brokerage, business planning and modeling, environmental and financial due diligence, loan request packages, operational analysis, transportation analysis, market research, negotiation of legal agreements, project development management on solid waste projects seeking permits, expert witness landfill and transfer station permit valuation and predatory pricing analysis. In addition, since December 2014 Mr. Burnham has served as the CEO and Managing Member of Encell Composites of which he was a co-founder. Encell developed and was granted U.S. and other patents on an alternative railroad crosstie produced from recycled material - principally crumb rubber from scrap tires. Mr. Burnham earned a Bachelor of Science in Civil and Environmental Engineering from the University of Wisconsin.

We believe that Mr. Burnham is qualified to serve on our Board of Directors because he brings extensive experience in mergers and acquisitions, project development, and environmental services. Mr. Burnham’s pertinent experience, qualifications, attributes and skills include expertise in business development, risk management, and operational oversight.

Bjarne Borg was appointed as a director of RenX effective June 17, 2025. Mr. Borg serves as the Executive Chairman of Index Investment Group, which he co-founded in 1998. Index Investment Group, through a collection of related companies, develops business projects in real estate and renewable energy and provides private equity to invest in complementary businesses. With over 35 years of experience in managing start-ups and multinational corporations, Mr. Borg focuses on real estate, renewable energy, and disruptive equity investments. Mr. Borg’s expertise extends to public markets, having listed bonds on NASDAQ, and serving on advisory boards for banking institutions. He has served on the South Florida advisory boards for SunTrust Bank and Truist Bank (NYSE: TFC), and is currently serving as a director of JFB Construction Holdings (NASDAQ: JFB) and on the advisory/ambassador boards for ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ: CNOB) and Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida (NASDAQ: SBCF). Mr. Borg began his career in IT consulting before transitioning to accounting and eventually focused on investments and developments across Sweden, the USA, and Canada.

We believe that Mr. Borg is qualified to serve on our Board of Directors because he brings extensive knowledge of investment management, renewable energy, and finance. Mr. Borg’s pertinent experience, qualifications, attributes and skills include his expertise in capital markets, management, and finance.

Peter G. DeMaria, CFA was appointed as a director of RenX effective April 11, 2023. Mr. DeMaria is a senior banking and finance professional with over thirty-eight years of experience with middle market, mid-corporate, financial sponsor and real estate clients in both domestic and international markets. From December 2018 through May 2022, Mr. DeMaria served as a Senior Managing Director/Group Manager for the middle-market and corporate banking group at PNC Bank where he and his team advised middle market and large corporate clients in the New Jersey and New York City regions. Prior to PNC Bank, Mr. DeMaria served as Managing Director at JPMorgan (December 1984 through November 2018) where he spent nearly 34 years specializing in cash flow and asset-based lending, capital markets and investment banking products. Mr. DeMaria received his BS in Finance and Accounting from Lehigh University (1984). He received a Masters in Business Administration from the Stern School of Business at New York University (1991) and an Executive Management Certificate at the Fuqua School of Business at Duke University (1998).

We selected Mr. DeMaria to serve on our Board of Directors because he brings extensive knowledge of the banking and finance industry. Mr. DeMaria’s pertinent experience, qualifications, attributes and skills include financial literacy and expertise, managerial experience and the knowledge and experience he has attained through his banking and finance activities.

John Scott Magrane, Jr. was appointed as a director of RenX effective April 11, 2023. Mr. Magrane is an investment banking professional with over thirty-five years of experience advising power-related enterprises, including utilities, independent power companies, rural electric cooperatives, governments and energy technology companies. Mr. Magrane currently serves as Vice Chairman at Coady Diemar Partners, LLC, a registered broker dealer and boutique investment bank which he founded that provides M&A, strategic and financial advisory, and private capital market services, and from March 2018 to July 2020, served as Chairman and CEO of the firm. From July 2021 until August 2023, Mr. Magrane served on the board of directors of Hydromer (HYDI Pink), global business-to-business (B2B) surface modification and coating solutions provider offering polymer research & development, and manufacturing services capabilities for a wide variety of applications. Prior to Coady Diemar Partners, LLC, from July 1987 to December 2001 Mr. Magrane was employed by Goldman Sachs & Co. where his responsibilities encompassed all manner of corporate finance and strategic advisory activities. While at Goldman, he started the firm’s Energy Technology effort. Mr. Magrane began his career and spent 10 years with Blyth, Eastman Dillon & Co. and Paine Webber where he specialized in energy and power project finance. Mr. Magrane earned his undergraduate degree in economics from The College of Wooster in 1970 and his MBA from The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania in 1973.

We selected Mr. Magrane to serve on our Board of Directors because he brings extensive knowledge of the investment banking and finance industry. Mr. Magrane’s pertinent experience, qualifications, attributes and skills include financial literacy and expertise, managerial experience and the knowledge and experience he has attained through his investment banking and finance activities.

Christopher Melton was appointed as a director of RenX effective April 11, 2023 and has served as a director of SG Holdings since November 4, 2011. Mr. Melton is a licensed real estate salesperson in the States of South Carolina and Georgia and until June 2019 was a principal of Callegro Investments, LLC, a specialist land investor investing in the southeastern U.S., which he founded 2012. Since June 2019 he has served as a specialist Land Advisor with SVN International Corp. Mr. Melton also serves on several public and private boards, including JFB Construction Holdings since March 2025, Safety Shot Holdings, Inc. (formerly Jupiter Wellness, Inc.) since August 2019 and SRM Entertainment, Inc. since June 2023. From February 2018 until June 2019, he served as chief investment officer and analyst at TNT Capital Advisors, a capital advisory firm based in Florida. He also served as a sales agent as MSK Commercial Services, a commercial real estate company, from February 2018 to June 2019. From 2000 to 2008, Mr. Melton was a Portfolio Manager for Kingdon Capital Management (“Kingdon”) in New York City, where he ran an $800 million book in media, telecom and Japanese investment. Mr. Melton opened Kingdon’s office in Japan, where he set up a Japanese research company. From 1997 to 2000, Mr. Melton served as a Vice President at JPMorgan Investment Management as an equity research analyst, where he helped manage $500 million in REIT funds under management. Mr. Melton was a Senior Real Estate Equity Analyst at RREEF Funds in Chicago from 1995 to 1997. RREEF Funds is the real estate investment management business of Deutsche Bank’s Asset Management division. Mr. Melton earned a Bachelor of Arts in Political Economy of Industrial Societies from the University of California, Berkeley in 1995. Mr. Melton earned Certification from University of California, Los Angeles’s Anderson Director Education Program in 2014. Mr. Melton earned a certificate in cybersecurity for managers from M.I.T. in 2021 and certificate in AI strategy from Cornell in 2023.

We selected Mr. Melton to serve on our Board of Directors because he brings extensive knowledge of the finance and the real estate industry. Mr. Melton’s pertinent experience, qualifications, attributes and skills include financial literacy and expertise, managerial experience and the knowledge and experience he has attained through his real estate investment and development activities.

Anthony M. Cialone was appointed as a director of RenX effective June 17, 2025. Mr. Cialone currently serves as President and Chief Operating Officer of Resource Group, a position he has held since January 2019. He brings over 30 years of executive leadership experience, with a strong track record in corporate operations, risk management, and strategic planning. At Resource Group, he has led key initiatives in biomass-to-industrial energy conversion and composting, developed investor-focused funding strategies and financial models, optimized transportation logistics and closed-loop supply chains, and advanced the company’s growth through targeted acquisitions. Since May 2020, Mr. Cialone has also served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Microtec Development & Holdings LLC, where he directs financial planning, capital structuring, and the commercialization of Microtec’s proprietary waste-to-value technologies. In addition, since March 2022, Mr. Cialone has served as President and Chief Operating Officer of AggrePlex, LLC, where he leads corporate strategy, operations, and market development for the company’s production of environmentally sustainable pozzolans used as supplementary cementitious materials. Mr. Cialone holds a Bachelor of Science in Economics and Finance and a Master of Business Administration in Corporate Finance, both from Fordham University. In addition, he has completed advanced coursework and executive education programs at Harvard Business School Online, MIT Professional Education, New York University, and the Stanford Graduate School of Business, earning certificates in Business Strategy, Entrepreneurship & Innovation, Finance & Accounting, Leadership & Management, Life Cycle Assessment, Sustainable Infrastructure Systems, and Chief Sustainability Officer Training, among others. He also holds multiple professional certifications (inactive), including Certified Internal Auditor (CIA), Certified Management Accountant (CMA), Certified Financial Manager (CFM), Certified Treasury Professional (CTP), Accredited Valuation Analyst (AVA), and is Certified in Mergers & Acquisitions (CM&AA). Mr. Cialone previously held securities licenses, including Series 6, 27, and 63.

We believe Mr. Cialone is qualified to serve on our Board of Directors because he brings extensive knowledge of organics processing, environmental services operations, and working with state and local government officials to develop and implement environmentally responsible operations in the organics processing and logistics sector. Mr. Cialone’s pertinent experience, qualifications, attributes and skills include expertise in operations management, environmental compliance, and public-private partnerships.

Jeffrey Tweedy was appointed as a director of RenX effective April 11, 2023. Mr. Tweedy is an accomplished, multi-faceted leader with approximately thirty years of executive experience in the fashion and retail industries. Since March 2021 Mr. Tweedy has served as a Brand Advisor to Sean Jean Clothing, an award-winning clothing and lifestyle brand founded by Sean Combs. From November 2007 to March 2021, Mr. Tweedy served as President and CEO of Sean John, having previously served as Executive Vice President from February 1998 to March 2005, building the brand into a market leader, maximizing sales, including across international markets, and conceptualizing and launching a ground-breaking, profitable and highly visible menswear company distinguished by its sophisticated young men’s image. Mr. Tweedy has served on the Advisory Board of the Fashion Institute of Technology since January 2020.

We selected Mr. Tweedy to serve on our Board of Directors because he brings extensive knowledge of building brands and maximizing sales. Mr. Tweedy’s pertinent experience, qualifications, attributes and skills include financial literacy and expertise, managerial experience and the knowledge and experience he has attained through his executive experience in the fashion and retail industries.

David Villarreal’s biographical information is set forth above under “– Executive Officers”.

We selected Mr. Villarreal to serve on our Board of Directors because he brings extensive knowledge of mortgage and real estate industry. Mr. Villarreal’s pertinent experience, qualifications, attributes and skills include financial literacy and expertise, managerial experience and the knowledge and experience he has attained through his real estate investment activities.

Committees of the Board of Directors

There are currently three standing committees of the Board of Directors – an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a Nominating and Governance Committee. The Board of Directors has adopted written charters for each committee, which are available on our website at www.renxent.com.

The tables below set forth the responsibilities of each of the standing Board committees. The Audit Committee is comprised of Peter DeMaria, John Scott Magrane, Jr. and Christopher Melton, with Christopher Melton serving as the Chairman. The Compensation Committee is comprised of Peter DeMaria, John Scott Magrane, Jr. and Jeffrey Tweedy, with John Scott Magrane, Jr. serving as the Chairman. The Nominating and Governance Committee is comprised of Peter DeMaria, Christopher Melton, and Jeffrey Tweedy, with Jeffrey Tweedy serving as the Chairman. Each of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee are comprised solely of directors who have been determined by the Board of Directors to be independent in accordance with SEC regulations and Nasdaq listing standards (including the heightened independence standards for members of the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee).